|Jul10-12, 03:41 PM||#1|
Amplitudes in CFT vanish. Why does N=4 have them?
one question in this growing amplitude business that i don't understand. Usually one says that conformal field theories do not have any non-trivial scattering amplitudes because one cannot define asymptotic states. But say we consider now N=4 Super Yang Mills and moreover treelevel. It is a conformal theory but it has non-vanishing amplitudes, like the infamous MHV amplitude. How can that be that an conformal field theory has non-vanishing amplitudes?
|Jul12-12, 11:40 AM||#2|
I think they have a method of breaking the conformal invariance in a controlled way. If you google "Bern Dixon Smirnov" or "BDS" you might turn up some information on the computation of IR safe amplitudes in these theories. I don't really understand it well enough to explain it though...
|Similar Threads for: Amplitudes in CFT vanish. Why does N=4 have them?|
|Where does the energy vanish to when light is red shifted||Cosmology||44|
|functions that vanish at integers||General Math||8|
|Square integrable/vanish at infinity?||Calculus||1|
|integrands that vanish everywhere||Calculus||1|
|What it's like to vanish--QM and the nature of consciousness||General Physics||1|