Register to reply 
Do Engineers Use Calculus? 
Share this thread: 
#1
Feb205, 11:06 AM

P: 35

A heated debate broke out in class today.
The topic was whether or not engineers use a lot of calculus on the job. We are talking about practicing, professional engineers, not engineering students. I'm on the side that says NO  the class of realworld problems that are addressable using calculus is very small; that the vast majority of realworld situations are analyzed using numerical methods. The other side disagreed and suggested, for example, that electrical engineers use a good deal of calculus since in many cases the theoretical situation they are looking at matches the real, physical situation. What do you think? 


#2
Feb205, 11:35 AM

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 1,817

Depends on the work you do.
If you're an engineer which takes existing devices and utilized them (sort of like building systems engineers), then odds are you wont use too much. If you're developing new systems, then you will probably need it a great deal. 


#3
Feb205, 11:36 AM

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 7,336

Many Mechanical engineers do little mathematical analysis, they simply over design so that they are not near any questionable boundaries. When they do apply math they have a book full of canned formulas to draw on.
When analysis is done it takes the form of a differential equation, rarely in the real world will a differential equation have a good simple closed form solution, therefore numerical analysis. BUT... setting up the differential equation requires knowledge and understanding of calculus. Even if you do not ever solve another integral in your life after completing college the understanding of nature that you gain in calculus can be and will be applied frequently if you go into a career in engineering. 


#4
Feb205, 11:45 AM

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 5,532

Do Engineers Use Calculus?
And are you willing to trust your (expensive) real world system to black box that does numerical analysis without checking that black box against some known cases by hand? 


#5
Feb205, 12:58 PM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 1,593

You need Calculus and Differential Equations at least to get through the classes. Any Engineer in or outside of school is expected to know these well. Work lots of problems to get good at it.



#6
Feb205, 01:04 PM

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 5,532

I might add one thing:
The job market is bad right now. Not all engineering graduates hold engineering jobs (this one included). I teach math at a community college, and several of my colleagues here are engineering grads. If they did not remember their calculus, they'd be collecting unemployment checks. Math is simply part of the engineer's toolbox, and it should be that way. 


#7
Feb205, 01:39 PM

PF Gold
P: 669

A great many physical concepts are defined in terms that are only precise if you use calculus. Thus, rather than always actually calculating with calculus one is often dealing with concepts like magnetic flux, which are ill defined without it, even if you don't solve an integral.



#8
Feb205, 01:46 PM

Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 2,793

I can only think of three modules out of 25 I've done in my engineering degree which have not used calculus to some extent.
Couldn't agree more with Tom about maths just being a tool. It's like having a massive hammer, it's no good unless you know how and when to use it. 


#9
Feb205, 03:57 PM

Mentor
P: 22,313

I agree with pretty much everything said and would also like to add that Calculus also falls under the category of general science/engineering knowledge. Once you learn calculus, the relationship between velocity and acceleration, for example, takes on a whole new meaning. Tools like calculus are what cause scientists and engineers to look at the world around them in a different way than everyone else. And if you simply memorize the formulas, you won't get that understanding  and having that mindset is one of the big things that separates a good engineer from a bad one. I call it "voodoo engineering"  its how you can give two engineers a piece of information, one of them looks for a formula in a book to figure out what to do with it, the other just instinctively knows what it means.



#10
Feb205, 04:24 PM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
P: 2,907

Farina,
I'd have to agree with you. I consider myself a highly analytical type with over 15 years of engineering experience (BSME). I design pumps, compressors, cryogenic equipment and a vast variety of things at work. Each part of a machine gets a stress analysis, fatigue analysis, much of it gets a dynamics analysis, heat transfer analysis, thermodynamic analysis, fluid flow and pressure drop are things I've written papers on. The bible for stress analysis, Roarke's, and the bible for fluid flow, Crane paper #410, have virtually nothing in them which requires calculus. I've had to actually solve an integral maybe once every few years. It's so rare, that if I didn't know it, I'd not be missing much. But that's not really fair either, because as Russ points out, On the other hand, if you're a project engineer, engineering manager, etc... calculus is a long forgotten word. 


#11
Feb205, 06:46 PM

P: 35

Such as... ?? What kind of examples of realworld products can you think of that were developed with the aid of a great deal of calculus??  I'm at a loss to think of too many reallife examples of practicing engineers using calculus extensively as part of their job function. I sent this question to the director of Fuel Cell Research for Visteon (Ford Motor Company's spunoff supplier  a $27 billion company). He himself is a EE. He was emphatic that a background in calculus was very important for providing an important theoretical background, but stressed what I hear all the time from physicists: virtually no interesting realworld physical phenomena are solveable analytically. They are, rather, solveable using numerical methods. Makes me wonder why numerical methods aren't stressed a lot more in ugrad and grad engineering courses. 


#12
Feb205, 06:47 PM

P: 35

this seems to be what i'm hearing most...



#13
Feb205, 06:50 PM

P: 35

very well said... I'll bring this to class on Friday (and will
certainly reference the source  thank you). 


#14
Feb205, 08:27 PM

PF Gold
P: 1,236

well the integral is used when you dip into differential equations
most engineers wont admit this but there are shortcuts they could use to cut the calculations in half if they used more advanced math, but if a simpler math works well they'll stick with it. most statics is geometry and basic physics. although you could use calculus on it and get more advanced models 


#15
Feb305, 02:38 AM

P: 35

Your typical ME, CE, EE, etc. won't be spending time
programming a computer. Your second point, however, is one I agree with: knowledge of calculus provides valuable insight to the basis of many numerical approaches, as well as the workings of nature. 


#16
Feb305, 02:57 AM

P: 66

We had a similar conversation in a physics forum.
I think that engineering students should be made aware that once they begin their professional engineering careers they will be relying much more on computational than on analytical methods. This insight would better them and increase their chances of on the job success. 


#17
Feb505, 06:38 PM

Admin
P: 21,911

Most engineers may use tools, i.e. numerical methods, which have already been developed. My organization develops new models and applications, therefore we 'get back to the basics'. Engineers involved in fundamental R&D of technology probably use calculus more often than those involved in direct applications of technology. 


#18
Mar1605, 10:39 AM

P: 1,781

Even if you don't use it, you must know it.
A doctor may never treat a heart attack, but he must know how if one comes up, or he's not a Doctor. 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
What are engineers like?  General Engineering  29  
DSP Engineers  Academic Guidance  2  
Any working engineers?  General Discussion  3  
Electrical Engineers vs Computer Engineers  Academic Guidance  16 