Does Light Have Infinite Mass When Traveling at the Speed of Light?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of mass in relation to light and its speed, specifically whether light has infinite mass when traveling at the speed of light. Participants explore theoretical implications, mathematical formulations, and the nature of mass in the context of special relativity.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that for mass to travel at light speed, it must be infinite, referencing E=MC^2 and its implications.
  • Others argue that for an object to travel at light speed, its rest mass must be zero, suggesting that infinite mass is not a valid concept.
  • One participant mentions that the transformation formula for mass cannot be applied at light speed, proposing an alternative equation that relates energy and momentum.
  • There is a discussion about the distinction between rest mass and other forms of mass, with some suggesting that light's behavior implies it has infinite mass, while others refute this claim.
  • Some participants express confusion about the implications of dividing by zero and the concept of invariant mass.
  • Participants discuss the relationship between energy, momentum, and mass, with references to specific equations that govern these relationships in special relativity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether light has infinite mass when traveling at the speed of light. Multiple competing views remain, with some asserting infinite mass and others maintaining that light has zero rest mass.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes unresolved mathematical interpretations and assumptions regarding the definitions of mass in different contexts, particularly at light speed.

demosthenes_001
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I recently heard something very interesting. For mass to go light speed, it must be infinite. It can be proved by breaking apart E=MC^2.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I highly doubt it.
 
demosthenes_001 said:
For mass to go light speed, it must be infinite.


Even if it could, how could such a discovery in any way be significant?
 
On the contrary, for something to go light speed, its (rest) mass must be 0.

You may be thinking that, if an object with non-zero mass could go at light speed, according to the transformation formula, its mass would be infinite. What that does is prove, since there is no such thing as "infinite mass", that it is not possible for something with non-zero rest mass to go at light speed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Exactly! :biggrin:
 
demosthenes_001 said:
I recently heard something very interesting. For mass to go light speed, it must be infinite. It can be proved by breaking apart E=MC^2.


Simply because it's singular in the point v=c,the formula
m_{SR}=\frac{m_{0}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^{2}}{c^{2}}}}

cannot be used
This one can and it yields the correct results within the framework of SR
E^{2}=m_{0}c^{4}+p^{2}c^{2}

Try to make rest mass infinite and see that the total energy is also infinite.Ergo,unphysical situation.

Daniel.
 
m_{SR}=\frac{m_{0}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^{2}}{c^{2}}}}
according to this formula... anything that travels with speed of light will have infinite mass...

but light also travels like a matter... and so light(matter) obviously travels at the speed of light... doesn't it imply that light(as a matter) has infinite mass?
 
No. Anything traveling at light speed has zero mass (m0).
 
yeah that is the rest mass... and light is never at rest
so isn't talking about the other mass a little more practical?
and 0/0 still is infinite right? so the other mass is infinite...
doesnt that mean that when light falls on me... i should be blown (no pun intended)?

PS: as you can judge by my no. of posts, i am new to this world... sorry if i sound stoopid or dumb...
 
Last edited:
  • #10
rahuld.exe said:
yeah that is the rest mass... and light is never at rest
so isn't talking about the other mass a little more practical?
A better term than rest mass is invariant mass.
and 0/0 still is infinite right?
No, it isn't.
so the other mass is infinite...
No, it isn't.

That equation you used does not apply where m0 = 0 or v = c. (As was pointed out in this thread over 6 years ago!)
doesnt that mean that when light falls on me... i should be blown (no pun intended)?
No, the energy and momentum of light are related by the second equation in post #6, which gives you: E = pc. Neither the energy nor momentum of light is infinite.

If you wanted to define the 'relativistic' mass of a photon, it would be E/c2, which is also not infinite.
 
  • #11
hmm... thank you for clearing it out!
what is 0/0 anyway? not defined?
 
  • #12
rahuld.exe said:
hmm... thank you for clearing it out!
what is 0/0 anyway? not defined?
Not defined.
 
  • #13
thank u!
 
  • #14
rahuld.exe said:
m_{SR}=\frac{m_{0}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^{2}}{c^{2}}}}
according to this formula... anything that travels with speed of light will have infinite mass...

but light also travels like a matter... and so light(matter) obviously travels at the speed of light... doesn't it imply that light(as a matter) has infinite mass?

It's better to think of and use only one formula which is valid for all <particles> from special relativity.

E^{2}=m_{0}c^{4}+p^{2}c^{2}

With operators instead of scalar functions, this formula holds valid in quantum specially-relativistic theories as well. That's where the photons come from.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 130 ·
5
Replies
130
Views
16K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
830