Radar Detectors in Australia: Truth or Scare Tactic?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Civilian2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Detectors Radar
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the legality and functionality of radar detectors in Australia, particularly focusing on the existence of devices that can detect radar detectors, known as "radar detector detectors." Participants explore the technical aspects of how radar detectors operate and whether they emit signals that could be detected.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the practicality of owning radar detectors in Australia due to the presence of radar detector detectors used by police.
  • One participant mentions VG-2 technology, suggesting that it is indeed possible for police to detect radar detectors.
  • A participant explains that radar detectors may emit a weak signal while attempting to detect incoming radar waves, which can be picked up by radar detector detectors.
  • Another participant provides a detailed explanation of how standard heterodyne radio receivers, including radar detectors, can inadvertently broadcast a weak signal due to the local oscillator used in tuning.
  • Concerns are raised about the size and expense of purely passive radar detection devices, which would not emit signals but would require complex filtering systems.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and agreement regarding the functionality of radar detectors and the implications of their use in Australia. There is no consensus on the overall effectiveness or legality of radar detectors in the context discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the discussion involves technical details about radar detection technology, including the potential for signal leakage and the complexity of passive devices. There are unresolved questions about the practical implications of these technologies.

Civilian2
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I was reading something today about it being stupid to own a radar detector in Australia because the police carry radar detector detectors with them. Is this even possible?

I would have assumed that radar detectors don't send out a signal of sorts but only attempt to detect incoming radar waves. I of course don't have the knowledge to make a valid judgement though.

Truth or scare tactic?
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
I have also wondered this, perhaps the Electrical Engineers could easily answer.
 
Yes, it is possible. I did a quick search and it's called VG-2 technology. Still not sure how it works. Of course the high-end detectors are "immune" to VG-2. I have absolutely no idea how it works, I'm just glad radar detectors are legal where I'm at.
 
Here :

http://radar.757.org/VG2.htm

Seems like a detector emits ever so slightly when it looks for radar. "Detector detectors" search for this emission. In other words, detection is not a "passive" process. I suppose detection involves the slight emission resonating with the incoming wave.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Standard heterodyne radio receivers use a local oscillator for tuning. When you want to tune a particular radio station, you adjust the frequency of this local oscillator. The output of the local oscillator is mixed (heterdyned) with the incoming RF, which brings the desired signal down to baseband.

Unfortunately, some of the energy from the local oscillator sneaks its way back out the antenna and actually gets broadcast by the antenna. (The electricity doesn't know which direction it's "supposed" to travel!)

As a result, nearly all radio receivers actually broadcast a weak signal indicated what frequency they are tuned to. If you're listening to 105.3 FM on your car stereo, you'll actually be broadcasting a very weak 105.3 MHz carrier signal. Similarly, your radar detector is nothing more than a radio receiver operating in the GHz bands, and it also broadcasts some of its local oscillator energy. This leaked signal is not very strong, but it's strong enough for a cop to use a device like the VG-2 to catch you.

There are other radio receiver topologies that use purely passive electronics and won't leak this way, but they're huge and expensive and fragile. You wouldn't be able to hang one from your windshield, but you might be able to tow one on a trailer. Of course, that'd just make detection even easier.

- Warren
 
What makes passive devices so huge? Radar dishes? antennas? the long wavelengths involved?
 
Passive receivers would have to made out of a lot of filters -- tons of inductors, capacitors, and resistors of myriad values. They would have to be pretty precise, too, which means they'd be expensive. You'd also have to tune them regularly, as the seasons change.

- Warren
 
chroot said:
Standard heterodyne radio receivers use a local oscillator for tuning. When you want to tune a particular radio station, you adjust the frequency of this local oscillator. The output of the local oscillator is mixed (heterdyned) with the incoming RF, which brings the desired signal down to baseband.

Unfortunately, some of the energy from the local oscillator sneaks its way back out the antenna and actually gets broadcast by the antenna. (The electricity doesn't know which direction it's "supposed" to travel!)

As a result, nearly all radio receivers actually broadcast a weak signal indicated what frequency they are tuned to. If you're listening to 105.3 FM on your car stereo, you'll actually be broadcasting a very weak 105.3 MHz carrier signal. Similarly, your radar detector is nothing more than a radio receiver operating in the GHz bands, and it also broadcasts some of its local oscillator energy. This leaked signal is not very strong, but it's strong enough for a cop to use a device like the VG-2 to catch you.

There are other radio receiver topologies that use purely passive electronics and won't leak this way, but they're huge and expensive and fragile. You wouldn't be able to hang one from your windshield, but you might be able to tow one on a trailer. Of course, that'd just make detection even easier.

- Warren


Cheers mate that's very informative.
 

Similar threads

Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
7K
Replies
79
Views
11K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K