| New Reply |
Are superconductivity and melting not understood? |
Share Thread |
| Aug7-12, 01:43 AM | #1 |
|
|
Are superconductivity and melting not understood?
Hi all,
I've been told from a couple different people something along the lines of "we don't fully understand how melting (the phase transition) works". Same with superconductivity. But I thought melting was fairly straightforward: The molecules in the material keep gaining energy until they break free from their crystal intermolecular bonds, and then they have some weaker bonds holding them together. I also thought superconductivity was explained by BCS theory. Is there any truth to this? I assume if there is, it's something much deeper and more mathematical, and that we have the general idea but there's still something more technical not understood. |
| Aug7-12, 02:23 AM | #2 |
|
|
The BCS theory works for standard superconductivity, but not high temperature superconductivity. (Or it at least doesn't fully explain high temp SC)
As for melting, I have never heard anyone say that before. |
| Aug7-12, 03:53 AM | #3 |
|
Recognitions:
|
See for example U. Gasser et al., "Melting of Crystals in Two Dimensions", ChemPhysChem, Volume 11, Issue 5, pages 963–970, April 6, 2010 for a review article. You will find: 2D melting is already hard to describe - 3d melting may become a nightmare. |
| Aug7-12, 10:04 AM | #4 |
|
|
Are superconductivity and melting not understood? |
| Aug7-12, 10:04 AM | #5 |
|
|
|
| New Reply |
Similar discussions for: Are superconductivity and melting not understood?
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Have i understood correctly? | Quantum Physics | 9 | ||
| Universe age!?, I never really understood that | General Astronomy | 18 | ||
| Why is turbulence so little understood? | General Physics | 7 | ||
| Torque. I thought i understood it. Obv I don't. | Introductory Physics Homework | 8 | ||
| I thought I understood... | Introductory Physics Homework | 13 | ||