Is GE's Corporate R&D Center a Beacon of Hope for Scientists and Engineers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Integral
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the impact of Carly Fiorina's tenure as CEO of HP and the broader implications for corporate culture and R&D in technology companies, particularly in relation to the GE Corporate R&D Center. Participants express various opinions on leadership changes, company philosophies, and the state of engineering and innovation in the industry.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express relief at Carly Fiorina's departure, attributing various negative changes at HP to her leadership, including the decline in product quality and the sale of core divisions.
  • Others argue that the decline in HP's reputation and employee loyalty is reflective of a broader trend in corporate America, where companies prioritize profits over principles.
  • A participant mentions that the spinoff of HP's measurement instrumentation division occurred before Fiorina's tenure, suggesting that not all changes can be attributed to her leadership.
  • There is a discussion about the current state of engineering jobs, with some participants noting a shift away from traditional engineering roles towards sales and support positions, raising concerns about the future of R&D.
  • One participant highlights the GE Corporate R&D Center as a potentially positive environment for scientists and engineers, suggesting it may offer better support for innovation compared to other companies.
  • Concerns are raised about the risks associated with R&D and the financial motivations that may discourage companies from pursuing innovative projects.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the negative impact of Carly Fiorina's leadership at HP, but there is disagreement on the extent of her responsibility for various corporate decisions. The discussion about the state of engineering and R&D reflects multiple competing views, with no consensus on the future direction of these fields.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the current state of R&D and the corporate environment, indicating a lack of clear data on job security and innovation practices in the industry.

Integral
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
7,232
Reaction score
66
HP has fired Carly Fiorina as CEO.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Integral said:
HP has fired Carly Fiorina as CEO.

Great day, indeed. For those who do not know, Carly was the one that discontinued the original line of HP calculators. She's also the one that brought them back under an Asian manufacturer called Kimpo, therefore, the quality of the recent ones are not as good as the originals. Hopefully, with Carly gone, we'll see HP calculators flourish again. :biggrin: :biggrin:
 
Not to mention that she also downplayed the Alpha and PA-RISC product lines to non-existence, while decreasing the quality of printers produced. She (well, up until today) pretended the Compaq merger was a good thing. Her backing of the Itanium over HP's mature UNIX workstation line was just plain idiotic.

I'm glad to see that she's gone. At one time HP was a respectable company, but now under Carly's reign, it's nothing more than an oversized Dell. I hope we'll see change in HP.
 
Is she also responsible for selling off the HP measument instrumentation division to Agilent ?
 
Gokul43201 said:
Is she also responsible for selling off the HP measument instrumentation division to Agilent ?

I believe so.

She about sold off every core market HP was in: Calculators, instrumentation, workstations, servers, etc. She did this so she could compete with the comodity PC vendors, which HP was no match for.
 
Last edited:
Well, this sure is good news ! <raising glass to toast a better future> :approve:
 
Not to mention that she also downplayed the Alpha and PA-RISC product lines to non-existence, while decreasing the quality of printers produced.

HUmmm... Carly did a lot of bad things to HP. Put her influence on the quality of the printers was negligible. The line of cartridges we are now producing is excellent. The line that will soon be coming on the market even better.

The main thing Carly did was to completely destroy the fundamental tenants of the Company as established by Hewlett and Packard. HP used to be THE company to work for now it is just another large company. Hopefully someone who understands what HP stood for can now take the reigns and start to put back together the pieces.

The Aglient spin off occurred before Carly, we can't blame that on her.
 
Integral said:
The Aglient spin off occurred before Carly, we can't blame that on her.

Uh oh ! Guess I jumped the gun on that one eh ?

Any chance the old RPN calculators will be back ? :rolleyes:
The 32S-II is so hard to find...they sell on Ebay for a gazillion bucks a pop.
 
  • #10
I still use my trusty HP-41CX :smile:

But the batteries are much harder to find these days.
 
  • #11
Gokul43201 said:
Uh oh ! Guess I jumped the gun on that one eh ?

Any chance the old RPN calculators will be back ? :rolleyes:
The 32S-II is so hard to find...they sell on Ebay for a gazillion bucks a pop.

You should look into the 33S. It's not quite as good as the 32SII, but the same form factor. I'm one of those individuals that paid for the 32SII and 48GX on Ebay. Needless to say, I paid almost twice the retail value for both, but they're worth every penny. I haven't worked with the 33S, but I've heard it's decent, and more like the 42S (which was top notch). The 49G+, the replacement for the 48 series, is pretty decent, also. When I said the quality wasn't as good, it's not, but the functionality has actually gotten better (as it should have).

Some of the interesting features of the 33S are: a two-line stack display (can you say HP 42S?), a library of physical constants (what a godsend, I'm tired of storing hbar in `h'), 32k of memory (this has to be almost 1000 times more memory than the 32SII, which means you can actually write more than two programs!).

Edit: Also contrary to the popular belief - HP STILL MAKES RPN CALCULATORS
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Integral said:
The main thing Carly did was to completely destroy the fundamental tenants of the Company as established by Hewlett and Packard. HP used to be THE company to work for now it is just another large company. Hopefully someone who understands what HP stood for can now take the reigns and start to put back together the pieces.

I wonder how many times I have heard this from people all over the country over the last five years...dozens perhaps? It's not just HP Integral. This is the new business philosophy in the US. With the exception of relatively few examples there is no loyalty to employees or principles anymore. This is probably the biggest reason that I choose to work for myself [internal politics is no less than next on the list, maybe first, but its a toss up]. In spite of all of the hype and bolony that companies dole out, through my own experience and that of many other people, I have learned to never assume that any company will ever act in my best interest. They don't and they won't.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
Integral said:
The main thing Carly did was to completely destroy the fundamental tenants of the Company as established by Hewlett and Packard. HP used to be THE company to work for now it is just another large company. Hopefully someone who understands what HP stood for can now take the reigns and start to put back together the pieces.

I don't know. I'd say Southwest Airlines has always been the big company to work for. Then again, I've never worked for either, so that conclusion is drawn mostly from Forbes reports.
 
  • #14
Integral said:
Hopefully someone who understands what HP stood for can now take the reigns...


I know, I know!
Hewlett Packard!


Now give me those reigns, I have work to do!
 
  • #15
loseyourname said:
I don't know. I'd say Southwest Airlines has always been the big company to work for. Then again, I've never worked for either, so that conclusion is drawn mostly from Forbes reports.
Evidently you are not in tune with the Hi Tech industry. I am sure SW Airlines is a great company... How many engineers do they employ? How much R&D do they do? Sorry I am not a pilot, Jet engine mechanic or a flight attendant, and have little interest in those positions. So for my class of job, HP was at one time THE place to work. Clearly there are a lot of factors which enter into the definition of "THE".
 
  • #16
Integral, at the rate that good jobs are racing overseas, maybe you should break out the wrenches.

A friend of mine, an aerospace engineer working on robots at Wacker Siltronics, once asked me if I know of anyone who still does real engineering anymore. I do know of a few places, but most engineers are really doing sales, tech support, redundant applications, or monkey work. Relatively few people work in a classic engineering environment any more. One reason for this is very clear. The risk for R&D is so high that few companies wish to assume the liability. There is a saying out there: It's cheaper to steal than innovate. It's a common philosophy that you let the fools develop the product and go broke. When they're gone or on their knees, the competition moves in and picks up the pieces and profits. If we are to encourage innovation then we need to offer better protection from techno-pirates and cut-throat business practices.
 
Last edited:
  • #17
Ivan Seeking said:
The risk for R&D is so high that few companies wish to assume the liability.
I don't think it is so much risk as it is money from the bottom line, i.e. less money in the pockets of the top level/executive management. Sorry, to be so cynical, but I have seen top level R&D or S&T (Science and Technology) groups decimated over the last two decades.

One 'relatively' bright spot seem to be GE Corporate R&D Center, Schenectady, NY. I am not sure how it compares to 20 years ago, but

http://geglobalresearch.com/

May be a good place for scientists (physicists and chemists) and engineers. Global Research supports all of GE technology and manufacturing operations.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K