Thread Closed

Kurzweil and Immortality

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Feb15-05, 06:39 PM   #1
 

Kurzweil and Immortality


http://www.cnn.com/2005/HEALTH/diet.....ap/index.html

Your thoughts boys and girls =)
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Bird's playlist could signal mental strengths and weaknesses
>> Minus environment, patterns still emerge: Computational study tracks E. coli cells' regulatory mechanisms
>> Bacterium uses natural 'thermometer' to trigger diarrheal disease, scientists find
Feb19-05, 12:25 PM   #2
 
Blog Entries: 4
I think that 20 years is too soon
There hasn't been a significant prolongation of human lifespan by scientific methods never in history, so to believe that overnight we are going to achieve immortality is like to believe in star signs. Completely absurd
Nanomachines are actually in progress, but they are very far to achieve the efficiency to keep perfect regulation of the human body
I'm not sure if immortality will be achieved some day, but for sure not before two hundred years from now
Feb19-05, 11:46 PM   #3
 
When a real biologist/biochemist starts making these claims, then I'll start taking them seriously.
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Kurzweil and Immortality
Thread Forum Replies
Ray Kurzweil: genius or naive optimist? General Discussion 4
im curious...what does it take for someone to be immortal? General Discussion 11
Quantum immortality General Discussion 12
Immortality would you consider it? General Discussion 22