Mastering Logarithms: Simplify with 2/log9 A - 1/log3 A = 3/log3 A

  • Thread starter Thread starter thomasrules
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithm
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around simplifying the logarithmic equation involving different bases, specifically focusing on the expression 2/log9 A - 1/log3 A = 3/log3 A. Participants are exploring properties of logarithms and identities related to base changes.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the transformation of logarithmic expressions and the application of logarithmic identities. There are attempts to rewrite the original equation using common denominators and to clarify the relationship between logarithms of different bases. Questions arise about specific steps and identities used in the simplification process.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing with various approaches being suggested. Some participants have provided identities and transformations, while others express confusion and seek clearer explanations. There is no explicit consensus on a single method, but multiple lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the extent of guidance provided. There is a focus on understanding the underlying principles of logarithmic identities without arriving at a complete solution.

thomasrules
Messages
243
Reaction score
0
I don't know how to show that:

2/log underscore9 A-1/log underscore3 A = 3/log underscore3 A
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you asking:

[tex]\log_{9}(a-1) - \log_{3}(a) = 3 \log_{3}(a)[/tex]

?
 
NO.

2/((log under9)a)-((1/log under3)a)= 3/((log under3)a)

GOT IT?
 
your question is basically
[tex]\frac{2}{log_9 A} - \frac{1}{log_3A} = \frac{3}{log_3A}[/tex]

do you know the identity:
[tex]log_ax=\frac{log_bx}{log_ba}[/tex]


this implies
log_9A= (1/2)log_3A [/color]
 
yes

and so...
 
Ok. So you have [tex]\frac{2}{log_9 A} - \frac{1}{log_3A} = \frac{3}{log_3A}[/tex]

If you get a common numerator of 6, you can rewrite this as

[tex]\frac{6}{3log_9 A} - \frac{6}{6log_3A} = \frac{6}{2log_3A}[/tex]

From there you can multiply by [tex]\frac{1}{6}[/tex] and cancel out the top.

Can you solve it from there?
 
see the white letter in my first post
 
Probably, you need the fact that

[tex]2\log_9 x = \log_3 x[/tex]

which follows because:

If we put [tex]y = \log_9 x[/tex], then [tex]x = 9^y[/tex], and therefore

[tex]\log_3 x = \log_3 9^y = y\log_3 9 = 2y = 2\log_9 x[/tex]

(I hope that's right.)
 
nm holy ****...how would I know to set y to that?

and so how does 2log_9x=log_3x?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
damnit all of you gave me different ways but now I'm confused ...can someone really go easy step by step

I tried something else. DOn't know if its right but how do I prove:

log_9a=2log_3a
 
Last edited:
  • #11
plug in [tex]log_9A=1/2 log_3A[/tex] in your left hand side of [tex]\frac{2}{log_9 A} - \frac{1}{log_3A} = \frac{3}{log_3A}[/tex]
you'll see the answer instantly, what is your problem?

the prove had already provided by James R in #8 post, which part you don't understand?
 
  • #12
how you got 1/2log_3A
 
  • #13
how you got 1/2log_3A
see post number 8 by JamesR
or use the identity:
[tex]log_ax=\frac{log_bx}{log_ba}[/tex]
this identity can be proved by the same method in post #8
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K