Thread Closed

What Is Needed To Make An Intelligent Species?

 
Share Thread
Feb23-05, 10:20 PM   #1
 

What Is Needed To Make An Intelligent Species?


Suppose on one planet all the ingredients neccessary for life is available, as we know it will evolve but what are the chances of it evolving into an intelligent species (like us), do you just give it time and let time do its thing or do you need some other special ingredient?
PhysOrg.com astronomy news on PhysOrg.com

>> Three centaurs follow Uranus through the solar system
>> Final curtain for Europe's deep-space telescope
>> Hubble spots a very bright contortionist
Feb23-05, 11:07 PM   #2
 
Oh please, don't be shy - ask the really big questions!
;-)

I think once you get past
1] Is there a God?
and
2] Why are we here?
then your question
3] How did we get to be what we are?
is pretty much number 3 on the list of profoundly sought answers by Mankind.


Personally, I believe that intelligence is an exceedingly long shot of survival traits.
Feb24-05, 12:28 AM   #3
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
I don't think that's the direction Gold is going, Dave. I also disagree with your conclusion that intelligience is an 'exceedingly long shot'. Intelligience would seem to be the natural consequence of any evolutionary sequence. It has huge survival value. Feel free to decry its inadequacies, but is still efficient.
Feb24-05, 08:13 AM   #4
 

What Is Needed To Make An Intelligent Species?


u believe we are intelligent.
i guess our intelligence tends to 0 when comparing to our very little knowledge with respect to space and time.
i guess by then, we won't be able to know its ingredients
thus we don't know what it needs more.
In fact can you define intelligence?
i guess for a human being, i prefer to say "logic" instead of "intelligence"
and i also believe that our Universe is "intelligent" but i can't explain why.
Feb24-05, 08:38 AM   #5
 
The answer is the "Genetic Algorithm" of nature! It is beginning to be used by humans to solve problems that require considerable intelligence. With reproduction & crossing over, mutations, fitness & natural selection, we came to be what we are. Without the intelligence we would be less likely to find solutions to life problems, and hence survive.
In another planet with the conditions of earth, intelligent life would surely emerge, although in a somewhat different form, depending on the fitness requirements and the history of events in that planet.

[QUOTE = A_I_]
i guess for a human being, i prefer to say "logic" instead of "intelligence"
[/QUOTE]

If humans are not intelligent then who is???
Feb24-05, 12:33 PM   #6
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Gold Barz - Based on the theory of evolution, intelligence is not a necessary outcome, but as Chronos pointed out, intelligence has value for helping an organism survive (therefore, evolutionary mechanisms may favor the development of intelligence). Given that (1) intelligence is not a required outcome, (2) it is not clear how human intelligence developed, and (3) we have nothing else to compare our history to (no known alien species), I would say that there's no way to calculate the odds with any good certainty.

A I - I'd say that intelligence and knowledge are different things. For example, intelligence would be the ability to learn and knowledge would be what you learned. We may not know a big fraction of what is in the universe, but we have the ability to learn about it. Stone Age humans were just as intelligent as people today...they just had less scientific/institutional knowledge to work with.
Feb24-05, 03:42 PM   #7
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Quote by Gold Barz
Suppose on one planet all the ingredients neccessary for life is available, as we know it will evolve but what are the chances of it evolving into an intelligent species (like us), do you just give it time and let time do its thing or do you need some other special ingredient?
I think you need luck. Now, that's the same thing as waiting a long time of course. You know, play the lottery long enough and you'll have a good chance of winning in the course of many thousands of years. My view is that life is massively contingent: you could have all the ingredients and not luck, and I suspect no intelligent life will emerge. I think that's why it took so long to do it here. Need to persists long enough to increase the odds of the chance working in it's favor. We're lucky here I think. No more than two intelligent life forms in the Milky Way at any one time. Drake is way off but I wouldn't want to argue the point with him.
Feb24-05, 04:30 PM   #8
 
So out of all the "alien life" out there, if they do exist, how many do you think would be intelligent? (a ballpark figure)

i agree with Chronos, survival makes creatures smarter

edit: this is completely baseless but I think there would be more than two intelligent species in the Milky Way at any one time
Feb24-05, 07:02 PM   #9
 
Well, we do have somewhat of a reference frame here on Earth. Only one branch of the evolutionary tree has give rise to a creature with a significant capacity for reason ( which is how I will call it ). One in how many? I believe this would be somewhat similar to the proportion of life harbouring worlds where "reason" has emerged. Some factors specific to Earths evolutionary history may come and tweak this number a little but not significantly. Intelligence is just one strategy and it took a while before it paid-up for us.

Our real strength as a specie is our adaptability, which does stem from our intelligence : there are no ecosystem on Earth we cannot inhabit
(well... maybe oceanic abyss but you get the point, we are even making our first steps at living in space.)
But intelligence only gave us a definite edge in adaptability fairly recently when we domesticated fire. Before that, intelligence had a fairly neutral value has far as evolutionary traits go. We were in fact not a particularly successful branch of evolution in comparison to many others and palaeontologists believe that we dwindled on the edge of extinction a few times. So intelligence, in its early phase, has a lot of potential as a survival strategy but it took the greatest part of our history to really be any good. Before that, its chimp-with-a-stick V.S. sabertooth...

I see two milestones in our evolutionary history. One in our past, fire, pretty much assures us that humans will endure has long has the Earth does. Of course we will certainly have ups and down but even catastrophic ecological degradation, at this point, will not manage to wipe out our specie. Billions may die, but not all. It would be nice however if we smartened up before that happens . The only thing with the potential to eradicate humans at this point his a cosmological event: an asteroid collision or a neighbouring gamma ray emission *. This brings me to my second, future, milestone: space colonisation. If human manage to be able to survive independently of the Earths resources, well I believe we as a specie will live " forever ". Intelligence definitely has the greatest potential of all strategies but evolution does not select for far distant future potential, it selects for survival now...



* Oh and maybe the wrath of ASIMO
Feb24-05, 07:21 PM   #10
 
How about my question though?
Feb25-05, 03:00 AM   #11
 
"If humans are not intelligent then who is???"

i'm not saying that human aren't intelligent, but their intelligence is minimum;
evidence - until now we only use like 10% of our intelligence, maybe we will find a way to use the 100%; can anyone imagine how it would be?

-i agree with phobos about his third point of view
- "I'd say that intelligence and knowledge are different things"
I don't think it is right because ur example shows how much they are related,
they are complementary having what u learned which is "knowledge" it is in deed the work of ur intelligence; without intelligence there's no advanced knowledge.
I say advanced because there are two types of knowledge:
1- obervational knowledge (the fact of seeing and observing quite simple phenomena and ability to determine the cause)
2-experimental knowledge (which needs a certain degree of intelligence, it's about analysing, and resolving complex phenomena).

I say the first form is quite in our hands;
the second one we are still a bit far


- "Stone Age humans were just as intelligent as people today...they just had less scientific/institutional knowledge to work with."

although they had less scientific/institutional knowledge to work with
i don't think they were as intelligent as people today
argument - "genetic algorithm" (ramollari)

and i also say that relativity also takes turn in intelligence.
They saw theirselves intelligent
We see them less intelligent
we are intelligent
Next generations are more intelligent
they will see us less intelligent

I say it all started with simple logic statments - when verified - became knowledge;
this knowledge reflected intelligence.
This little knowledge they knew helped for the amplification of their intelligence;
therefore amplification of our knowledge;
and it continues.
Feb25-05, 03:38 AM   #12
 
Being inteligent is a great advantage for surviving. But actually, what is the determine factor to be inteligent?
Feb25-05, 04:25 AM   #13
 
i guess being able to quick analysis is the most thing which shows how intelligent u r!
Feb25-05, 09:32 AM   #14
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Quote by Gold Barz
So out of all the "alien life" out there, if they do exist, how many do you think would be intelligent? (a ballpark figure)

i agree with Chronos, survival makes creatures smarter

edit: this is completely baseless but I think there would be more than two intelligent species in the Milky Way at any one time
This is how I see it: Life is massively contingent and there are plenty of stars in the Milky Way. These two cancel leaving unity. I added one because I'm optimistic.
Feb25-05, 09:46 AM   #15
 
Intelligent species and intelligent species like us, are two different things.

A great many species on Earth would probably be counted as intelligent is discovered on another planet instead of Earth. Certainly, just about any vertebrate or social insect would qualify. What if we discovered the equivalent of worms or jelly fish, however?
Feb25-05, 11:04 AM   #16
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Quote by ohwilleke
Intelligent species and intelligent species like us, are two different things.

A great many species on Earth would probably be counted as intelligent is discovered on another planet instead of Earth. Certainly, just about any vertebrate or social insect would qualify. What if we discovered the equivalent of worms or jelly fish, however?
Not sure if you're referring to me but anyway I'd like to qualify my statement: I mean intelligent like us: technologically advanced: No more than two at any one time in the Milky Way in my humble opinion. And while I'm at it, that Petter Jennings report last night about UFOs: Someone stated something about harnessing a million suns to create a wormhole. A million? Come on, I don't think there is a single entity in the whole universe that can do that. That's just me though.
Feb25-05, 11:15 PM   #17
 
So if life is present, evoultion takes its course, would intelligence be unlikely or likely?
Thread Closed

Similar discussions for: What Is Needed To Make An Intelligent Species?
Thread Forum Replies
what are the materials needed to make a simple electromagnetic bell? plzzzzzzzzzzzzzz General Physics 4
[SOLVED] Force needed to make a disk climb a step Introductory Physics Homework 8
Save Tarzan and Make sure his Vine doesnt break(HELP NEEDED)! Introductory Physics Homework 2
A Rediscovery, a New Species Biology 0