Perfect shapes in mathematics


by Niaboc67
Tags: mathematics, perfect, shapes
Niaboc67
Niaboc67 is offline
#1
Oct29-12, 02:48 PM
P: 38
Why does mathematics deal with the world of perfect spheres, triangles and squares. I understand how this can be applied to architecture and engineering. But this seems counter-intuitive to 'nature' that surrounds us which is objects that are not perfect in shape. The earth for instance isn't a perfect sphere it budges out at the equator. So why is mathematics always prone to using perfect angles and objects to be measured when nature isn't that way at all.

Thank you
Phys.Org News Partner Mathematics news on Phys.org
Math modeling handbook now available
Hyperbolic homogeneous polynomials, oh my!
Researchers help Boston Marathon organizers plan for 2014 race
mfb
mfb is offline
#2
Oct29-12, 03:53 PM
Mentor
P: 10,864
Mathematics uses other shapes, too. But often, circles, triangles and so on are good approximations. In addition, they are used as introduction as they are easier to treat than other shapes.

The earth for instance isn't a perfect sphere it budges out at the equator.
Plus many more corrections to the shape.
Studiot
Studiot is offline
#3
Oct29-12, 03:53 PM
P: 5,462
nature isn't that way at all.
That is what inspired fractal geometry.

Natural geometry also follows some more specialised mathematics - spirals, fibonacchi series, and some very complicated equal area shpes.

Note also that the word geometry derives from 'measurement of the Earth'.

arildno
arildno is offline
#4
Oct29-12, 04:18 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
P: 12,016

Perfect shapes in mathematics


Quote Quote by Niaboc67 View Post
Why does mathematics deal with the world of perfect spheres, triangles and squares. I understand how this can be applied to architecture and engineering. But this seems counter-intuitive to 'nature' that surrounds us which is objects that are not perfect in shape. The earth for instance isn't a perfect sphere it budges out at the equator. So why is mathematics always prone to using perfect angles and objects to be measured when nature isn't that way at all.

Thank you
Why should nature guide maths?
Niaboc67
Niaboc67 is offline
#5
Nov1-12, 03:37 AM
P: 38
Quote Quote by arildno View Post
Why should nature guide maths?
I guess the way i see it is. I was mainly just wondering why math uses examples from natural world it's perfect objects seems a bit unrealistic. Though I am no mathematician i would think mathematics becomes so approximate that any shape of nature can be imagined.
arildno
arildno is offline
#6
Nov1-12, 09:39 AM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
P: 12,016
And what should you approximate reality FROM, if not from the "perfect" shapes???

You can call a rectangle a perfect, unrealistic figure for all you like, but it is from the rectangle and its associated area formula that you can basically derive the area of any other shape.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Thinking about changing from Physics to Applied Mathematics/Pure mathematics Academic Guidance 0
prove the sum of two even perfect squares is not a perfect square Calculus & Beyond Homework 13
Show that perfect a perfect reflector is a conic section with Fermat's principle Introductory Physics Homework 0
Perfect practice makes perfect! General Math 0
3D shapes with perfect polygons General Math 5