Fast way to test for existence of a file in C++?

  • Context: C/C++ 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ahrkron
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Existence File Test
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on efficient methods to check for the existence of a file in C++. The user initially attempted to use the fopen function, which proved to be slow. A more effective solution was provided using the stat function from sys/stat.h for Unix systems, which checks file existence quickly. For Windows, the System::IO::File::Exists method is recommended, while noting the differences in function naming conventions between platforms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of C++ programming language
  • Familiarity with file handling in C++
  • Knowledge of Unix and Windows file system differences
  • Basic understanding of system calls and libraries like sys/stat.h and System::IO
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the stat function and its usage in Unix-based systems
  • Explore System::IO::File::Exists for file handling in C++ on Windows
  • Learn about the access function from unistd.h for checking file permissions
  • Investigate cross-platform file handling techniques in C++
USEFUL FOR

Software developers, particularly those working with C++ on both Unix and Windows platforms, and anyone looking to optimize file existence checks in their applications.

ahrkron
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
755
Reaction score
2
Here's the situation:

I'm running over a few thousand files, some of which may have already been processed. In order to decide if a file has to be processed, I check if the corresponding output file exists.

The problem:

I tried using FILE *f = fopen(<filename>,"r"), and test for f!=0; however, it takes a long time to just open the files.

Any suggestions?

Edit: FILE instead of TFILE.[/color]
 
Last edited:
Technology news on Phys.org
How about this:

Code:
#include <sys/stat.h>

int fexist( char *filename ) {
  struct stat buffer ;
  if ( stat( filename, &buffer ) ) return 1 ;
  return 0 ;
}

This is under Unix, so stat.h may not be under sys/ for windows.
 
If you're programming for Windows check if the following works:

Code:
System::IO::File::Exists(file);

which returns true if the file exists, false otherwise.
 
Last edited:
Here is the msdn docmentation for stat.h:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/vclib/html/_crt__fstat.2c_._fstati64.asp

It looks microsoft is up to their dirty tricks again. Instead of calling their function stat(...), they conveniently change it to _fstat(...). If anyone wants to port their code to unix they would need to change their function calls. Nice job. Even borland uses stat(...).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks!

That is fast enough.
Just it seems to have the logic reversed: stats(...) returns -1 for non-existing files and 0 for existing files.

(or it may be my expectation of 1 to mean "true" and 0 to be "does not exist").
 
OK. I was just being dumb. I had a piece of code before the actual test of file existence that was using some serious IO. Now both versions (dduardo's and my original FILE use) work ok.

Thanks anyway!
 
dduardo said:
Here is the msdn docmentation for stat.h:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/vclib/html/_crt__fstat.2c_._fstati64.asp

It looks microsoft is up to their dirty tricks again. Instead of calling their function stat(...), they conveniently change it to _fstat(...). If anyone wants to port their code to unix they would need to change their function calls. Nice job. Even borland uses stat(...).

But you code you provided will work with Microsoft's compiler.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You also have the posix

#include <unistd.h>
int access(const char *path, int amode);

Not sure it works on *dows, though
 
Um... did you notice that the posts you responded to are six and a half years old? :smile:
 
  • #10
jtbell said:
Um... did you notice that the posts you responded to are six and a half years old? :smile:
That only makes it only more important to check if the file still exists.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K