Register to reply

Resonance Structures

by Woopydalan
Tags: resonance, structures
Share this thread:
Feb4-13, 08:16 PM
P: 746

I am having difficulty discerning which resonance structures are considerable enough to include and which are so unimportant that they should be discarded. There seems to be no general rule on this that I can find, so I was wondering if such a rule existed or if someone can lead me in the right direction.
Phys.Org News Partner Chemistry news on
Chemists modify antibiotic to vanquish resistant bacteria
Abnormal properties of cancer protein revealed in fly eyes
Rooting out horse-meat fraud in the wake of a recent food scandal
Feb4-13, 09:17 PM
Other Sci
Sci Advisor
P: 1,402
Feb4-13, 09:28 PM
P: 746
Thanks, that cleared a lot of things up (though they need to spell check and grammar check that article again)!!

Feb5-13, 01:51 AM
Sci Advisor
P: 3,633
Resonance Structures

Rule number 5 is debatable. In general, two one electron bonds are more stable than one two-electron bond due to electronic repulsion.
Especially, what do they mean with their example?
How can structure 1 have 3 unpaired electrons? Either the electrons combine to total spin 1/2, then the molecule is already described by structures II and III, or the electrons combine to spin 3/2, then structure I corresponds to an excited state of the molecule which won't mix in structures II and III.
In the case of oxygen you also don't need molecular orbital considerations to show that triplet oxygen is more stable than singlet oxygen. Especially two three electron bonds are more stable than one two electron bond and one four electron bond. This was already shown in 1937 by Wheland and Lennard-Jones

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Resonance structures you don't see Biology, Chemistry & Other Homework 1
Resonance Structures Chemistry 5
Resonance Structures Biology, Chemistry & Other Homework 3
Resonance structures Biology, Chemistry & Other Homework 4
Resonance Structures Biology, Chemistry & Other Homework 2