Integration by parts when a limit is infinity.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges of performing integration by parts when one of the limits of integration is infinity, specifically focusing on the integral \(\int_0^\infty x^z e^{-x} dx\) with \(z = \frac{-1}{\pi}\). Participants explore the implications of this limit on the integration process and the resulting expressions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in applying integration by parts due to the presence of an infinite limit, leading to confusion about the term \(uv\) becoming infinite.
  • Another participant questions the limit \(\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} x^z e^{-x}\) and suggests a different form for analysis.
  • There are multiple contributions discussing the behavior of the limit as \(x\) approaches infinity, with some suggesting that \(\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} x^y e^{-x} = 0\) for all \(y \in \mathbb{R}\).
  • One participant clarifies that they are not trying to solve the integral but rather to express it in a specific form for Gaussian Quadrature.
  • Several participants engage in a discussion about the application of L'Hospital's rule to evaluate limits involving exponential decay compared to polynomial growth.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of understanding the behavior of terms as \(x\) approaches infinity, particularly in relation to the gamma function.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the handling of the infinite limit in the context of integration by parts. There is no consensus on a single method or resolution to the initial problem posed, as various approaches and interpretations are discussed.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the behavior of functions as \(x\) approaches infinity, which may not be universally applicable without further clarification. The dependence on the specific values of \(z\) and the implications for the integral are also noted but not resolved.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and practitioners dealing with improper integrals, particularly in the context of integration techniques and limit evaluations in mathematical analysis.

Shinjo
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I'm having a tough time trying to do integration by parts with one of my limits being infinity. My Integral looks like:

[tex]\int_0^\infty x^z e^{-x} dx[/tex] with [tex]z = \frac{-1}{\pi}[/tex]

Now if I let [tex]u = e^{-x}[/tex] and [tex]dv = x^z dx[/tex],
I will have: [tex]du = -e^{-x} dx[/tex] and [tex]v = \frac{1}{z + 1} x^{z + 1}[/tex] and so
[tex]uv - \int_0^\infty v du<br /> = e^{-x} \frac{1}{z + 1} x^{z + 1} - \int_0^\infty \frac{1}{z + 1} x^{z + 1} -e^{-x} dx[/tex]

However, since one of the limit is infinity, the term
[tex]uv = e^{-x} \frac{1}{z + 1} x^{z + 1}[/tex] has a freakin infinity subbed in it. The answer is actually,
[tex]\frac{1}{z + 1} \int_0^\infty x^{z + 1} e^{-x} dx[/tex], which is what my integral part looks like. What am I doing wrong? Why do I get a term with infinity at the front?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is [tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} x^ze^{-x}[/tex]?
 
I think it is easier to look at the limit like this:

[tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty} \frac{1}{x^{\frac{1}{\pi}}e^{x}}[/tex]
 
[tex]x^ze^{-x} = \frac{x^z}{e^x} \neq \frac{1}{x^{\frac{1}{z}}e^x}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Shinjo said in his first post that [tex]z = -\frac{1}{\pi}[/tex]
 
oops!

Anyways the integral actually is just equal to [tex]\Gamma \left( \frac{\pi - 1}{\pi} \right)[/tex]
 
Shinjo said:
I'm having a tough time trying to do integration by parts with one of my limits being infinity. My Integral looks like:

[tex]\int_0^\infty x^z e^{-x} dx[/tex] with [tex]z = \frac{-1}{\pi}[/tex]

Now if I let [tex]u = e^{-x}[/tex] and [tex]dv = x^z dx[/tex],
I will have: [tex]du = -e^{-x} dx[/tex] and [tex]v = \frac{1}{z + 1} x^{z + 1}[/tex] and so
[tex]uv - \int_0^\infty v du<br /> = e^{-x} \frac{1}{z + 1} x^{z + 1} - \int_0^\infty \frac{1}{z + 1} x^{z + 1} -e^{-x} dx[/tex]

However, since one of the limit is infinity, the term
[tex]uv = e^{-x} \frac{1}{z + 1} x^{z + 1}[/tex] has a freakin infinity subbed in it. The answer is actually,
[tex]\frac{1}{z + 1} \int_0^\infty x^{z + 1} e^{-x} dx[/tex], which is what my integral part looks like. What am I doing wrong? Why do I get a term with infinity at the front?

But the way to calculate the gamma function is to do that actual integral...

anywayz, do you see my problem though? when my [tex]v[/tex] becomes [tex]v = \frac{1}{z + 1} x^{z + 1},[/tex]my [tex]x^{z + 1}[/tex] term gets moved to the top and turns into infinity.
 
[tex]\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} x^ye^{-x} = 0 \ \forall y \in \mathbb{R}[/tex]
 
Hmm...maybe I should have mentioned this earlier, but I am not trying to solve the integral. I have to get it in a specific form so I can use Gaussian Quadrature. In order to do that I have to integrate by parts.

The answer is supposed to be: [tex]\frac{1}{z + 1} \int_0^\infty x^{z + 1} e^{-x} dx[/tex], but I don't know how to get rid of the [tex]uv = e^{-x} \frac{1}{z + 1} x^{z + 1}[/tex] term, since one of the limits is infinity.

Thank you for the help btw, it is much appreciated.
 
  • #10
[tex]\left[e^{-x}\frac{1}{z+1}x^{z+1}\right]_0^\infty = \lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} \left(\frac{e^{-x}x^{z+1}}{z+1}\right) - 0 = \frac{1}{z+1}\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} e^{-x}x^{z+1}[/tex]

then just apply the result in my last post.
 
  • #11
Data said:
[tex]\left[e^{-x}\frac{1}{z+1}x^{z+1}\right]_0^\infty = \lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} \left(\frac{e^{-x}x^{z+1}}{z+1}\right) - 0 = \frac{1}{z+1}\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} e^{-x}x^{z+1}[/tex]

then just apply the result in my last post.

Ahh...I see what you're saying. Thank you.

I don't mean to question your method, I know I might be becoming a nuisance by now, but can you tell me why [tex]\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} x^ye^{-x} = 0 \ \forall y \in \mathbb{R}[/tex]? I mean, doesn't [tex]\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} x^y = \infty[/tex]?
 
  • #12
Shinjo said:
Ahh...I see what you're saying. Thank you.

I don't mean to question your method, I know I might be becoming a nuisance by now, but can you tell me why [tex]\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} x^ye^{-x} = 0 \ \forall y \in \mathbb{R}[/tex]? I mean, doesn't [tex]\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} x^y = \infty[/tex]?
That's not really relevant when you have a denominator that is also a function of x. For example, the trivial f(x) = x/x or g(x) = x/(x2 + 1), neither of which diverge as x increases without bound. Now refer to your problem f(x) = xz+1/ex. Note that both numerator and denominator diverge as x increases without bound, so we may apply L'Hospital's rule to examine the equivalent limit (z+1)!/ex which approaches zero as x increases without bound.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
I think he meant [tex]x^z[/tex] This gives you [tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty} \frac{1}{x^{\frac{1}{\pi}}e^{x}} = 0[/tex]
 
  • #14
hypermorphism said:
That's not really relevant when you have a denominator that is also a function of x. For example, the trivial f(x) = x/x or g(x) = x/(x2 + 1), neither of which diverge as x increases without bound. Now refer to your problem f(x) = xz+1/ex. Note that both numerator and denominator diverge as x increases without bound, so we may apply L'Hospital's rule to examine the equivalent limit (z+1)!/ex.

Ah, Thank you. I just noticed, when the x is an exponent, it increases the term much faster than when x is a base. So I can see how x^y / e^x will = 0 for all y.

Thank you to all once again.
 
  • #15
No nuisance. If I thought it were a nuisance to justify my math, I wouldn't be on a math forum! :)

Say [tex]y \in \mathbb{R}[/tex]. Note that if [tex]y \leq 0[/tex] the result is obvious, so assume [tex]y > 0[/tex]. Then let [tex]\lfloor a \rfloor[/tex] and [tex]\lceil a \rceil[/tex] represent the floor and ceiling functions applied to [tex]a[/tex] respectively. Thus if [tex]m = \lfloor y \rfloor, \ M = \lceil y \rceil[/tex] we clearly have [tex]x^me^{-x} \leq x^ye^{-x} \leq x^Me^{-x} \ \forall x \geq 1 \Longrightarrow \lim_{x\rightarrow \infty}x^me^{-x} \leq \lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} x^ye^{-x} \leq \lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} x^Me^{-x}[/tex] (by a slightly generalized version of the squeeze theorem).

Now, let [tex]a \in \mathbb{N}^+[/tex]. By l'Hopital's rule, applied [tex]a[/tex] times, we have

[tex]\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} x^ae^{-x} = \lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \frac{x^a}{e^x} = \lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \frac{ax^{a-1}}{e^x} = . \ . \ . = \lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \frac{a!}{e^x} = a! \lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} e^{-x} = 0[/tex]

and since for [tex]y \ge 0[/tex] clearly [tex]M \geq m \geq 0, \ M, m \in \mathbb{N}[/tex] we get [tex]0 = \lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} x^m e^{-x} \leq \lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} x^ye^{-x} \leq \lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} x^M e^{-x} = 0 \Longrightarrow \lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} x^y e^{-x} = 0[/tex] as we wanted. QED.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K