Finding the Maximum Spread of Rumors Using Differential Equations

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a mathematical model for the spread of rumors, specifically focusing on the differential equation \(\frac{dy}{dt} = 3y(3-2y)\). Participants explore how to determine the proportion of the population that has heard the rumor when it is spreading the fastest, involving concepts of calculus such as derivatives and integrals.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about finding the maximum spread of rumors and provides their initial work on the problem.
  • Another participant questions the reasoning behind setting the first derivative equal to zero to find when the rumor is spreading fastest.
  • A different participant notes the necessity of an initial condition for the problem.
  • There is a suggestion to take the second derivative before setting it to zero, clarifying that the goal is to maximize the first derivative.
  • One participant shares their revised approach, calculating the second derivative and finding a critical point at \(y = \frac{3}{4}\). They inquire if their earlier integral is correct and if they can substitute this value into their equation.
  • Another participant asks for clarification on the initial condition needed for the problem.
  • A participant summarizes their findings, presenting a solution involving logarithmic expressions and discussing the implications of the roots of the cubic equation derived from the second derivative.
  • One participant reflects on the reasoning behind neglecting certain values in their calculations, acknowledging the basic nature of some of the concepts involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct approach to the problem, as there are multiple perspectives on how to handle the derivatives and the initial conditions. Some participants challenge each other's reasoning and calculations, indicating ongoing debate.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved aspects regarding the initial conditions and the assumptions made during the separation of variables. The discussion includes various interpretations of the mathematical steps involved, which may lead to different conclusions.

Jameson
Insights Author
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,533
Reaction score
13
I don't know why, but I am stuck on this seemingly easy question. Here's the question and the work I've done.

---------------------
A certain model for spread of rumors states that [tex]\frac{dy}{dt} = 3y(3-2y)[/tex] , where [tex]y[/tex] is the proportion of the population that has heard the rumor at time [tex]t[/tex]. What proportion of the population has heard the rumor when it is spreading the fastest?

--------

Ok. You are given the derivative of the proportion function, so setting it equal to 0 will give you when it is changing the fastest/slowest. Solving the equation [tex]3y(3-2y) = 0[/tex] you get 0 and 1.5...

Next part is to find the original equation and evaluate it at 1.5. So I will need to separate the variables, and when I do I get:

[tex]\frac{1}{3y(3-2y)}dy = dt[/tex]

This integral (I did it on my calculator) is [tex]\frac{-\ln{\frac{\mid2x-3\mid}{\mid{x}\mid}}}{9}[/tex]

When I evaulate 1.5 I get [tex]\infty[/tex]

Help me please.
Jameson
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your procedure isn't quite right. Can you explain why the time when the proportion is changing fastest is when [tex]y^\prime = 0[/tex]?
 
Also you need an initial condition.
 
You need to take the derivative one more time before you set it equal to zero. You are maximizing dy/dt, not y.

edit: sorry that wasn't very clear--I should say take the derivative with respect to y, since they have given you dy/dt as a function of y.
 
Last edited:
Way to give away the answer to my question! :p
 
Alright then. So [tex]\frac{d^{2}y}{dx^{2}} = 9 - 12y[/tex] and setting it equal to zero you get [tex]y = \frac{3}{4}[/tex]

Is my integral correct from my first post correct? So now I can just plug .75 in for y?
 
Can anyone give their thoughts to this question?
 
What is the initial condition?
 
Well, its been a day so I'd like to write this one up if you've moved on (it took me this long to figure it out so I couldn't help at the start). Can someone check it. I don't want to make mistakes.

The equation modeling rumor spread is:

[tex]\frac{dy}{dt} = 3y(3-2y)[/tex]

Separating variables and integrating from [itex]y_0[/itex] to y yields:

[tex]ln|{\frac{2y}{3-2y}}|=9t+k[/tex]

or:

[tex]y(t)=\frac{1}{2}[\frac{3e^{9t+k}}{1+e^{9t+k}}][/tex]

where:

[tex]k=ln|\frac{2y_0}{3-2y_0}|[/tex]

Since y is a proportion: [itex]0<y\leq1[/itex], (assume y>0 since if no one knows the rumor at time 0 then it won't spread) the logarithm quantity is always positive and thus I can omit the absolute values.

A plot (for y(0)=0.1) is attached. Looking at the plot, one can see that the rate of y is fastest at the point of inflection, that is, when the second derivative is zero. But we know what the first derivative is:

[tex]y^{'}=9y-6y^2[/tex]

Thus:

[tex]y^{''}=9y^{'}-12yy^{'}[/tex]

or substituting in the first derivative:

[tex]y^{''}=72y^3-162y^2+81y=0[/tex]

Solving this cubic equation, yields the roots:

0, 3/4, and 3/2.

Since y is a proportion between 0 and 1, we take the root 3/4 and conclude the rumor is spreading fastest when 75% of the group knows about it. Using the logarithm version of the solution, we can plug in 0.75 and determine, for a specific initial condition, the time when this occurs.
 

Attachments

  • rumor1.JPG
    rumor1.JPG
    3.6 KB · Views: 409
Last edited:
  • #10
Ok, thanks to Daniel (from another post) I now understand why y cannot be 0 or 3/2: separating variables, one assumes that y can't be this since that would be dividing by zero. This is the reason we neglect absolute values and also why we must choose 3/4 as the root to the cubic. Yea, I know it's basic and in every Calculus text; I don't claim to be a wiz.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K