Integral Calculus Bee: Antidifferentiating & Finding Primative Functions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The thread discusses the topic of antidifferentiating and finding primitive functions, specifically through a compilation of non-routine integrals that challenge students' integration skills. Participants share integrals they find interesting or difficult, and discuss methods for solving them, with a focus on both theoretical and practical aspects of integral calculus.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose a list of non-routine integrals that should challenge students who are proficient in integral calculus.
  • One participant suggests that integral #9 may stump the most people, while others express differing opinions on its difficulty.
  • Several participants discuss specific integrals, such as #10 and #2, and share methods for solving them, including substitutions and partial fractions.
  • There is a mention of definite integrals that are considered more interesting, with examples provided by one participant.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about the difficulty of certain integrals, indicating that they may require advanced techniques or knowledge beyond basic calculus.
  • Discussions arise around the integral of \( e^{\tan x} \), with differing views on the complexity of finding an exact solution versus using series expansions.
  • Participants share their approaches to integrals and challenge each other's methods, indicating a mix of confidence and uncertainty in their techniques.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no clear consensus on which integral is the most difficult, as participants express varying opinions on the challenges posed by different integrals. Some participants agree on the difficulty of certain integrals, while others contest these views, leading to an ongoing debate.

Contextual Notes

Some integrals discussed may require advanced techniques not covered in standard calculus courses, and participants express uncertainty about the applicability of certain methods. The discussion includes references to specific mathematical concepts and techniques that may not be universally familiar.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students in integral calculus courses, educators looking for challenging problems, and anyone interested in deepening their understanding of antidifferentiation techniques.

phoenixthoth
Messages
1,600
Reaction score
2
And, yes, I mean what you think it means: antidifferentiating. Finding a primative. Whatever...

At my school, we're conducting an integration bee not unlike similar bees done elsewhere.

The purpose of this thread is two-fold:
1. To compile a list of non-routine integrals
2. To discuss how these integrals are done

Here is the list I came up with. Please add to the list. I'm not looking for 300 integrals no one at a community college can solve (and, yes, by "solve", I mean to antidifferentiate). They should stump a significant percentage of those who would get an A in Integral Calculus though not 100%.

A few of these are downright easy but they can stump the woefully inexperienced.

One or two of them are potentially very difficult if you're not clever enough.

1. Log[Sqrt[x]]/Sqrt[x]
2. Sin[Sqrt[x]]
3. (2^x)(Sqrt[1-4^x])
4. Log[Sqrt[x]]
5. Exp[x] Sin[x]
6. Exp[2 x]/Sqrt[Exp[x]+1]
7. 1/(Exp[x]+1)
8. 1/(2+Tan[x])
9. 1/(x^4 + 64)
10. Sqrt[Tan[x]]
11. 1/(1-(Sin[x])^2)
12. 1/(3+5Sin[x])
13. (1+x^2)^(-3)
14. (x^2)/(1+x^2)
15. (1+x)/Sqrt[-4+2x+x^2]
16. Log[(x+1)/(x-1)]/x^2
17. Cos[2x]/(8+Sin[2x]^2)
18. Sec[x]^2/Sqrt[1-4Tan[x]^2]
19. ArcTan[x]
20. Log[1+x]/x^2.

Thanks for your input!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the most difficult one according to you ?

i will solve it

marlon
 
Most are standard textbooks problems.
 
I would guess that #9 would stump the most people but I really have no idea.

You may find #10 and #2 fun as well.
 
Those are nice, but the tricks don't really get fun until definite integration:

[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-x^2} dx = \sqrt{\pi}[/tex]

[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{sin(x)}{x} dx = \pi[/tex]

The first one is a fairly trivial change of variable trick, and the second is found by contour integration. In addition to having these down pat, an integrator champ should be able to pull all the tricks: differentiating under the integral sign, direct integration of differential eq corresponding to the function, etc.
 
Last edited:
9 is probably the most easy one

2 is easy with a good substitution and ten is nice

marlon
 
I like these:

[tex] \int e^{ax} sin(bx)dx[/tex]

[tex] \int e^{ax} cos(bx)dx[/tex]

[tex] \int sec^n(x) dx[/tex]

(n is odd and positive in the last one).

They all have one thing in common: when integrating by parts, you have to recognize that you eventually get the same integral you started with, and you have to add a multiple of it to both sides to finish the problem.
 
Last edited:
You think 9 is easier than 4, 5, 14, 15, and 19? Hmm... Is there an easy way to do #9 that I don't know about? What's the easy way to solve #9?
 
9 is equal to

[tex]\int \frac{dx}{(x^2 + 8)^2 -16 x^2}[/tex]

then use a²-b² = (a-b)(a+b) in the denominator
then integration by partial fractions

marlon
 
  • #10
9 is easy because it is quite straightforeward this is the easiest way out

marlon, though i admit it requires some calculation
 
  • #11
Yeah that's how I'd do it but I wouldn't call factoring x^4+64 "easy." Sure, compared to the proof of FLT it's easy but... ;)
 
  • #12
how did you do 10 ?

marlon
 
  • #13
i got an answer by using the substitution t²=tanx and then apply partial fractions

marlon
 
  • #14
marlon said:
how did you do 10 ?

marlon

I'm no integral bee champion so this is probably not the best way to do it:

u=Tan[x] turns it into
Sqrt/(1+u^2).

Re-write:
u/(Sqrt(1+u^2)).

Now let v=Sqrt to get
2v^2 / (1+v^4) which is integrable by partial fractions as the denominator splits into (v^2+Sqrt[2]v+1)(v^2-Sqrt[2]v+1).
 
  • #15
any other questions ?

marlon
 
  • #16
[tex]\int e^{tan x} \ dx =... ?[/tex]

[tex]\int \sqrt{\sin x} \ dx =... ?[/tex] Piece of cake for champions like Marlon
 
  • #18
The integral exp(tanx) is not that difficult, if i am right. Write the exp(tanx) as a series :
sum over n of ((tanx)^n)/n!

Now the integral sign and summation sign can be interchanged so what we really need to integrate is (tan(x))^n...

i suppose that by writing tan as sin/cos, you can construct a recursion relation. This relation can be constructed by integration by parts...

marlon
 
  • #19
holy... geez talk about scaring a Calc 1 student... I don't even know how to approach some of those integrals... geez. The only thing that comes close that I can solve is probably applying an arctangent rule to no. 9 from my knowledge, but as marlon said I probably have to review partial fractions.

ack.
 
  • #20
Marlon,the [itex]\int e^{\tan x} \ dx[/itex] admits an exact (nonseries) solution among special functions.

Daniel.
 
  • #21
dextercioby said:
Marlon,the [itex]\int e^{\tan x} \ dx[/itex] admits an exact (nonseries) solution among special functions.

Daniel.

Which is ?

marlon
 
  • #22
[tex]\int e^{\tan x} \ dx=\frac{1}{2}ie^{i}\func{Ei}\left( 1,-\tan x+i\right) -\frac{1}{2}ie^{-i}\func{Ei}\left( 1,-\tan x-i\right) +C[/tex]

Daniel.
 
  • #23
What a clear 'exact' solution ?? !

I really think my approach is more intuitive and you don't need them 'electronic backups'

marlon
 
  • #25
dextercioby said:
Then do it.

Daniel.
:smile:

Well read the content of my posts... :rolleyes:

marlon
 
  • #26
It's so simple to talk,to give advice and not to calculate...:wink: I think that,regarding intuition,looking for this integral in G & R is simpler that computing a recursion formula...

Daniel.
 
  • #27
try to solve integral of x^3-2x^2+2x+3/(x^2+2x+2)^2
,, waiting for your answers guys ! have fun
 
  • #28
I'm taking my first integral Calc class, and thought I was getting pretty good. These things are nasty though. Thanks for teaching me some humility :approve:. I'm curious though how you learn to do these. I've looked ahead in my book, and I really don't think we're going to learn any methods in this class that suddenly make these integrals possible.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K