Register to reply

Friction heat generator

by Yuri B.
Tags: friction, generator, heat
Share this thread:
Yuri B.
#1
Mar23-13, 07:06 AM
P: 125
Friction is phenomenon we try to avoid but it may be useful.
Does anyone know about existing friction heat generators and what method they use ?
Seemingly, solid matter does not suit as it pulverizes as well as wears out the generator parts. Probably, remains gas compression. There cannot be a liquid whose stirring can cause very high heat emission ?
Phys.Org News Partner Engineering news on Phys.org
Greater safety and security at Europe's train stations
Fingerprints for freight items
On the way to a safe and secure smart home
russ_watters
#2
Mar23-13, 08:05 AM
Mentor
P: 22,303
Yes, stirring a liquid produces heat. I did a project at a chocolate factory where the chocolate was stirred with 100kW mixers and the vats had to be water-cooled to keep from burning the chocolate.

I'm not sure how this information could be useful though...
Jobrag
#3
Mar23-13, 08:33 AM
P: 477
I'm not sure why you would want a friction heat generator, you'd need to take power or fuel of some description, turn it into mechanical energy and then turn the energy into heat, and probably a lot of noise. Going power or fuel to heat direct is going to be more efficent and easier.

AlephZero
#4
Mar23-13, 06:54 PM
Engineering
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 7,175
Friction heat generator

Quote Quote by russ_watters View Post
I did a project at a chocolate factory where the chocolate was stirred with 100kW mixers and the vats had to be water-cooled to keep from burning the chocolate.
That's a bit more impressive than wimpy "mechanical equivalent of heat" lab experiments like http://lectureonline.cl.msu.edu/~mmp/kap11/cd295.htm
AlephZero
#5
Mar23-13, 06:57 PM
Engineering
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 7,175
Quote Quote by Jobrag View Post
I'm not sure why you would want a friction heat generator, you'd need to take power or fuel of some description, turn it into mechanical energy and then turn the energy into heat, and probably a lot of noise. Going power or fuel to heat direct is going to be more efficent and easier.
Friction heat generators do have some uses - for example

Yuri B.
#6
Mar24-13, 02:40 AM
P: 125
I was thinking that wind or wave energy can be transformed directly to heat (where we need just the heat). Electricity generators utilising wind or wave energy are inevitably losing some of it on its transformations.
Only the power you would need to add to the system were for the controls and to drive a circulation pump.
One would need to find a most "efficient solution" having the highest heat generation while stirring, so to say, at the lowest viscosity.
russ_watters
#7
Mar24-13, 09:33 AM
Mentor
P: 22,303
1. Wind and wave energy is already directly converted to heat if we don't harness it to generate electricity.
2. All friction based energy conversions are 100% efficient, so they are all the same as far as the output goes. The only difference is the complexity of the device, which no matter what, will be more complex (expensive) than a heating element.

You're not looking for an overunity heating device, are you...?
Yuri B.
#8
Mar24-13, 10:38 AM
P: 125
I was not wrongly thinking there could be found a substance in the process in qwestion in which output energy exceeded input one, but it looks like this.
russ_watters
#9
Mar24-13, 05:14 PM
Mentor
P: 22,303
You can never escape conservation of energy.
Yuri B.
#10
Mar25-13, 12:21 PM
P: 125
Thank you for your answers ! Will now know how "Joule" and "Calorie" relation has been established, but most importantly for me - that any matter can be stirred with the same final result.
jim hardy
#11
Mar25-13, 05:58 PM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
jim hardy's Avatar
P: 3,686
A mechanical engineer will tell you that an ordinary pump slightly heats the fluid being pumped.
That's why big pumps always have something to assure minimum flow, so they won't overheat.


In our power plant we heat the reactor system to operating temperature (547F) in a reasonable number of hours by simply running the main pumps. Ours total about 18,000 horsepower.

Paddlewheel tests is I believe how the early scientists established the relation between work and heat.
I'm an old guy who still uses 778 ft-lbs per BTU and 3412.7 BTU/KWH...

old jim
Yuri B.
#12
Mar26-13, 01:18 PM
P: 125
But, finally, to put an end to the thread, why would not it work : the conversion of the wind energy directly into heat ?
russ_watters
#13
Mar26-13, 05:04 PM
Mentor
P: 22,303
All wind energy not converted to electricity is directly converted to heat.
jim hardy
#14
Mar26-13, 05:56 PM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
jim hardy's Avatar
P: 3,686
Quote Quote by Yuri B. View Post
But, finally, to put an end to the thread, why would not it work : the conversion of the wind energy directly into heat ?
A friend of mine wanted to do just that.
His application was for cattle ranches in Western US where winters are cold and windy.
The ponds and streams all freeze over in the bitter cold.
His intent was to place a small windmill at watering troughs out in the pastures.
They would drive a paddlewheel to warm the water, perhaps melting a spot in the ice big enough for the cattle to get a drink.

I don't think he ever finished his idea.

why would not it work : the conversion of the wind energy directly into heat
should work fine.
But it'll have to have that certain "pizazz" if you want consumers to buy it.
Maybe if you emblazon "914 Turbo" on the side.....

old jim
Yuri B.
#15
Mar27-13, 02:04 PM
P: 125
Melting a spot on a frozen pond in this way, Jim is, on my view, like scooping water with a sieve !
NascentOxygen
#16
Apr3-13, 02:06 AM
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 5,361
Didn't an early scientist measure the temperature increase after water had descended a high waterfall, to allow him to compare the increase in heat content with the loss of gravitational potential energy?
Yuri B.
#17
Apr3-13, 11:47 AM
P: 125
Quote Quote by NascentOxygen View Post
Didn't an early scientist measure the temperature increase after water had descended a high waterfall, to allow him to compare the increase in heat content with the loss of gravitational potential energy?
And what heat, approximately, is generated when 1 kg of water falls from 1 m of height ?
russ_watters
#18
Apr3-13, 12:19 PM
Mentor
P: 22,303
I think it was Joule who did it...

Do you know how to calculate the potential energy of an object...?


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Is friction affected by heat? Introductory Physics Homework 6
Ansys: Heat due to Friction Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework 4
Heat transfer - generator losses and dissipation Mechanical Engineering 1
Why does friction cause heat? Classical Physics 17
Friction & heat Introductory Physics Homework 2