Deriving the Exact Solution of the Schlichting ODE for Laminar Jet Flow

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Clausius2
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the exact solution of the Schlichting ordinary differential equation (ODE) for laminar jet flow. Participants explore the mathematical formulation, boundary conditions, and the process of solving the equation, which is a third-order ODE.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the Schlichting ODE and boundary conditions, expressing difficulty in deriving the expected solution.
  • Another participant questions the validity of having four boundary conditions for a third-order ODE, suggesting that one condition may be redundant.
  • A participant acknowledges the redundancy of the boundary condition f' = 0 at η = 0 and discusses the implications of this on the solution process.
  • Further mathematical manipulations are shared, including reductions of the left-hand side and right-hand side of the ODE, leading to integrals that relate to the boundary conditions.
  • One participant derives a form of the solution, f = (4cη²)/(1 + c²η²), but notes challenges in determining the constant c due to the logarithmic nature of the boundary conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the boundary conditions, with some agreeing on the redundancy of one condition while others maintain the necessity of the original set. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact determination of the constant c and the implications of the boundary conditions on the solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in the boundary conditions and the challenges posed by the logarithmic terms at η = 0, which complicate the determination of constants in the solution.

Clausius2
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,433
Reaction score
7
After spending large time trying to extract the exact solution of this ODE, I haven't been able to demonstrate the final result I'm given.

The equation is :

[tex]\frac{f'f}{\eta^2}-\frac{f'^2}{\eta}-\frac{ff''}{\eta}=\Big(f''-\frac{f'}{\eta}\Big)'[/tex]

where [tex]f=f(\eta)[/tex]

Boundary conditions are:

[tex]\eta=0[/tex] ; [tex]f=f'=f''=0[/tex]

[tex]\eta\rightarrow\infty[/tex]; [tex]f'=0[/tex]

I am supposed to obtain [tex]f=\frac{4c\eta^2}{1+c\eta^2}[/tex] with c= unknown constant.

but I don't find the way to gather the derivatives and solve the equation.

It corresponds to the exact similarity solution of the far field of a round laminar jet.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do u have 4 boundary conditions for a 3-rd order ODE...?

Daniel.
 
Clausius2 said:
After spending large time trying to extract the exact solution of this ODE, I haven't been able to demonstrate the final result I'm given.

The equation is :

[tex]\frac{f'f}{\eta^2}-\frac{f'^2}{\eta}-\frac{ff''}{\eta}=\Big(f''-\frac{f'}{\eta}\Big)'[/tex]

where [tex]f=f(\eta)[/tex]

Boundary conditions are:

[tex]\eta=0[/tex] ; [tex]f=f'=f''=0[/tex]

[tex]\eta\rightarrow\infty[/tex]; [tex]f'=0[/tex]

I am supposed to obtain [tex]f=\frac{4c\eta^2}{1+c\eta^2}[/tex] with c= unknown constant.

but I don't find the way to gather the derivatives and solve the equation.

It corresponds to the exact similarity solution of the far field of a round laminar jet.
The left-hand-side reduces to:
[tex]\frac{f'f}{\eta^2}-\frac{f'^2}{\eta}-\frac{ff''}{\eta}=-\frac{d}{d\eta}(\frac{1}{\eta}\frac{d}{d\eta}\frac{1}{2}f^{2})[/tex]
since we have:
[tex]\frac{d}{d\eta}\frac{1}{2}f^{2}=ff'[/tex]
and:
[tex]f'^{2}+ff''=\frac{d}{d\eta}ff'[/tex]
Evidently the right-hand-side reduces to:
[tex]\frac{d}{d\eta}(f''-\frac{f'}{\eta})=\frac{d}{d\eta}(\eta\frac{d}{d\eta}\frac{f'}{\eta})[/tex]
Maybe that helps..
 
Last edited:
dextercioby said:
Why do u have 4 boundary conditions for a 3-rd order ODE...?

Daniel.

You're right. One of them is redundant. I think [tex]f '=0[/tex] is not needed at [tex]\eta=0[/tex]

Arildno, it helps me a lot.

Let's see, according what you've said:

[tex]\Big[\eta\Big(\frac{f'}{\eta}\Big)'\Big]'=-\frac{1}{2}\Big[\frac{f^{2'}}{\eta}\Big][/tex]

integrating once and imposing the boundary constraint at [tex]\eta\rightarrow\infty[/tex]

[tex]\Big(\frac{f'}{\eta}\Big)'=-\frac{f^{2'}}{2\eta^2}[/tex]

that can be reshaped developing the right derivative to:

[tex]\frac{1}{2}f^{2'}=2f'-(\eta f')'[/tex]

integrating it another time and imposing [tex]f=0[/tex] at [tex]\eta=0[/tex]:

[tex]\frac{f^2}{2}=2f-\eta f'[/tex]

which leads to:

[tex]\frac{df}{-f^2/2+2f}=\frac{d\eta}{\eta}[/tex]

the right side can be calculated as:

[tex]\frac{1}{2}\Big(\frac{df}{f}+\frac{df}{4-f}\Big)[/tex]

So finally I obtain:

[tex]\frac{1}{2}ln\Big(\frac{f}{4-f}\Big)=ln\eta+A[/tex]

where [tex]A=ln(c)[/tex] is a constant which I haven't found the way to determinate with the boundary conditions because the the logarithms are not defined in [tex]\eta=0[/tex]. This constant is determined with the Integral Conservation Law of the Momentum Flux as Schlichting stated.

Anyway it gives:

[tex]f=\frac{4c\eta^2}{1+c^2\eta^2}[/tex]

Thank you very much for helping me. :wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K