Which mathematical analysis program is the best and why?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Spectre5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis Program
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the evaluation of various mathematical analysis programs, specifically Mathematica, Maple, and MATLAB. Participants share their opinions on the strengths and weaknesses of these software options, considering factors such as usability, pricing, and personal experiences.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that Mathematica is the best option due to its popularity and integration into educational curricula, citing references from MathWorld and MAA journals.
  • Others express a preference for Mathematica based on personal experience, suggesting that users should try different programs to see which they prefer.
  • Concerns are raised about the high cost of Mathematica, with estimates around $2000, although student pricing is mentioned as being significantly lower.
  • One participant notes that while they have limited experience with Maple, they have heard that Mathematica is generally considered superior.
  • Another participant shares specific complaints about Mathematica, including issues with error reporting, variable management, and documentation quality, while still expressing an overall positive view of the software.
  • Some participants mention the availability of different versions of Mathematica tailored for various uses, which affects pricing.
  • There is discussion about the availability of these programs at college bookstores, with prices ranging from $100 to $150 for students.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that Mathematica is highly regarded, but there is no consensus on which program is definitively the best. Multiple competing views remain regarding the strengths and weaknesses of each software option.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of experience with the software, and some mention specific issues related to their usage, indicating that personal experience may influence their opinions. The discussion does not resolve the comparative effectiveness of the programs.

Spectre5
Messages
182
Reaction score
0
In your opinion, which is the "best" mathematical analysis program and why?

Like...Mathematica, Maple, MatLab, some other one?

Thanks for any comments...just wondering which one I should look more into (actually buying that is)...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think that Mathematica is the best, as it seems to get the most publicity from top math sources that I've seen. Those include the mathworld cite and a lot of articles in MAA journals about integrating mathematica into curricula.

They're all really expensive though, I think. I thought Mathematica itself was like 2000 dollars or something. I could be horribly wrong.

If so, and you're in high school, wait till you get to college where you could probably obtain a free copy.
 
I like Mathematica but that's just me. The main ones are all pretty good so try them out and see which one you like. Also, what college you go to should dictate which one you get as the price is usually around $120 for students. I know Mathematica has a free trial you can download and some tutorials to get you started with the basics.
 
mewmew said:
I like Mathematica but that's just me. The main ones are all pretty good so try them out and see which one you like. Also, what college you go to should dictate which one you get as the price is usually around $120 for students. I know Mathematica has a free trial you can download and some tutorials to get you started with the basics.

I haven't used Mathematica but I've heard good things about it. I know there's different versions of it that exist based on certain uses I.e. there's a version designed for government use, student use, etc. The prices all vary based on those levels. I think the most expensive version will run you about $2000.
 
philosophking said:
mathworld cite [sic]

Notice all the "Wolfram Research" images on the Mathworld site? They also happen to be responsible for Mathematica. Small surprise that the website supports the software :smile:
 
Hey, ya...the only one I have experience with (limited experience at that) is Maple...but I thought that mathematica was generally considered the best as well...at least from as much as I have read and heard

Maple is what I have to use for my college class right now (no free copy for home computer...but can use it, or any of the other programs, on the school computers)...but some of the other classes use other ones...I know of some classes that use Maple, some use MatLab, and some Mathematica...all are available at the bookstore for $100-$150.

I was mostly just curious as to whether or not I should learn Maple in-depth or if I should bother buying it for $130 at the bookstore...but perhpas I will just learn Mathematica on the side instead.
 
I've used Mathematica for a few years now. Even though I like it, I do have some complaints:

1. Major one is error reporting. Lots of time I'll receive an error and it does not help in debugging the code.

2. Variable usage: If you have several notebooks open at the same time, all the variables are global unless you bracket the code in Module[{...}]; statements.

3. I don't know about anyone else, but Mathematica is the only program I run that can "totally" lock up my machine. That is, have to resort to turning it off! Can you believe that? Often it will lock up and have to terminate it via Task Manager thus loosing all data since the last save. I do run some complicated programs though (several hundred lines of Mathematica code).

4. The documentation is poor: doesn't give enough information to fully understand lots of commands.

5. I want my money back from that book he wrote. If I had a quarter for every time he said . . . but I digress.

Oh yea, so I'm working on an interesting problem about nesting square roots and I'm turning to looking at it with the "Nest" or "NestList" function in Mathematica. The book is too big and has always been a pain to handle.

I really like Mathematica though.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K