Are Chlorinated Hydrocarbons Biologically Magnified?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Soaring Crane
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the biological magnification of chlorinated hydrocarbons compared to organophosphates, focusing on their persistence and toxicity. Participants explore multiple-choice questions related to these compounds, examining their environmental impact and biological effects.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that organophosphates are less persistent and more biologically magnified compared to chlorinated hydrocarbons.
  • There is a suggestion that chlorinated hydrocarbons are biologically magnified, with one participant affirming this view.
  • Another participant argues that chlorinated hydrocarbons are not readily biotransformed, leading to longer persistence in biological systems and greater potential for biomagnification.
  • Participants discuss the implications of chlorinated hydrocarbons affecting non-target species, challenging the idea that they are target specific.
  • There is uncertainty regarding the toxicity of chlorinated hydrocarbons compared to other organic pesticides, with some questioning the phrasing of the comparison.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that chlorinated hydrocarbons are biologically magnified, but there is disagreement on the persistence and toxicity of these compounds compared to organophosphates. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specifics of their comparative effects.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the need for clarification on the definitions of terms used in the questions, particularly regarding the classification of pesticides and their sources. There is also mention of the complexity of the environmental impact of these chemicals, which may not be fully captured in the multiple-choice format.

Soaring Crane
Messages
461
Reaction score
0
1) Compared to chlorinated hydrocarbons, organophosphates are ___ persistent and are ___ biologically magnified.

A. less...less
B. less...more
C. more...less
D. more...more
E. equally...equally

I believe it's B. (Well, the first part is "less.")

2) Chlorinated hydrocarbons are

A. biologically magnified.
B. likely to be target specific.
C. degraded faster than other organic pesticides.
D. more toxic than organic pesticides.
E. None of the above

I want to say A as the correct one. Is it right?

Thanks.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Wait, now that I think about it, is #1 A?
 
You might also want to ask this in the biology forum, I'll do some research if I have the time.
 
Soaring Crane said:
1) Compared to chlorinated hydrocarbons, organophosphates are ___ persistent and are ___ biologically magnified.

A. less...less
B. less...more
C. more...less
D. more...more
E. equally...equally

I believe it's B. (Well, the first part is "less.")

Yes, you got it right in your reply, the answer would be "A". Since the chlorinated hydrocarbon pesticides (this should be added since there are numerous chlorinated hydrocarbons that are not pesticides) are not as readily biotransformed or broken down as the organophosphates, it logically follows that they will last longer in a biological system and therefore have more potential for biomagnification.



Soaring Crane said:
2) Chlorinated hydrocarbons are

A. biologically magnified.
B. likely to be target specific.
C. degraded faster than other organic pesticides.
D. more toxic than organic pesticides.
E. None of the above

I want to say A as the correct one. Is it right?

Thanks.

I agree with "A", but let's break this one down and see if any others fit. "B" does not work since it has been shown that numerous non-pest species including fish, birds and mammals are affected by chlorinated hydrocarbon pesticides. "C" we resolved above. "D" doesn't make sense since they are in fact "organic pesticides", perhaps the question is referring to pesticides derived from natural sources such as pyrethroids from Chrysanthemum sp. , but that is not apparent. "E" is wrong since we already know that they are definitely biomagnified ("A").
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 226 ·
8
Replies
226
Views
18K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
346