Conformal mapping in Complex Analysis

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on the concept of conformal mapping within the context of complex analysis. Participants seek clarification on the definition, examples, and implications of conformal mappings, exploring both theoretical and practical aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests an explanation of conformal mapping and its relation to complex analysis, indicating a lack of understanding of the concept.
  • Another participant asserts that a conformal map is an analytic map that preserves angles, suggesting that this connection to complex analysis should be clear.
  • A request for an example of conformal mapping is made to aid visualization and understanding.
  • One participant explains that a map is conformal at a point if its derivative does not vanish, emphasizing the definition and suggesting looking into how angles transform in terms of derivatives.
  • A specific example of a conformal mapping is provided, where the transformation z to az+b (with a≠0) is described as preserving angles through rotation, scaling, and translation.
  • Another participant discusses the relationship between conformal isomorphisms of the complex plane and complex automorphisms of the extended complex plane, providing an example of a mapping that transforms the upper half-plane to the open unit disc.
  • A further technical perspective is introduced, focusing on the analytic nature of the mapping function and its implications for the Jacobian determinant, leading to the derivation of four theorems related to conformal mappings.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and clarity regarding conformal mappings, with some providing definitions and examples while others seek further explanation. No consensus is reached on a singular understanding or example of conformal mapping.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the complexity of visualizing conformal mappings and the need for examples to aid understanding. There is also mention of the distinction between angle-preserving and orientation-preserving properties in the context of conformal mappings.

rhia
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
I would appreciate if someone could explain Conformal Mapping using Complex Analysis using an example. I get the rough idea but have no clue how complex analysis comes into the picture.

Thank You!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for reply.
Can you give an example to show how it works?
I am finding it difficult to visualize.
 
No, I cannot since I cannot understand what you need to do in order to understand it. A map is conformal at a point if its derivative doesn't vanish. It is a definition. Look up how angles transform (in terms of derivatives) to see why. I've no idea what you mean ny "how it works", sorry.

The map z goes to az+b (a=/=0) is a conformal mapping (ie map conformal at all points of its domain) of C to C. it's a rotation, scaling and translation, obviously it preserves angles.
 
using complex analysis one can prove that all conformal isomorphisms of the "complex plane", extend to complex automorphisms of the extended complex plane (the compelx projective "line"), hence have form (az+b)/(cz+d).

For example, the map sending z to w = (z-i)/(z+i) is an isomorphism of the extended complex plane, which sends the points z which are closer to i than to -i, to those points w of norm less than one.

I.e. this is an isomorphism from the upper half plane, onto the open unit disc.


Examples of conformal mappings seldom use complex analysis, but proofs that they have a certain form do so.

(I am using the word conformal here in the sense of not just angle preserving, which is the correct meaning, but also orientation preserving, hence complex holomorphic.)
 
From the complex point of view, the porpuse is to investigate in more general terms the character of transforms for which the mapping function [tex]w = u(x,y) + i\nu(x,y)[/tex] is analytic.

Since w = f(z) is analytic, substituting into the jacobian determinant, we get

[tex]J \left ( \frac{u,\nu}{x,y} \right ) = \begin{vmatrix} \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} & - \frac{\partial \nu}{\partial x} \\ \frac{\partial \nu}{\partial x} & \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} \end{vmatrix} = |f'(z)|^2[/tex]

From here there are 4 theorems which can be deduced...
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K