Calculating Frequency in Standing Wave Resonance

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the frequency of a standing wave in a pipe that is closed at one end and open at the other, with a specified length of 2.90m and the speed of sound in air as 344m/s. The original poster attempts to determine the frequency based on a guessed harmonic number and the relationship between wavelength and pipe length.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the choice of harmonic number and its implications for finding the frequency. There are questions about the appropriateness of using a guessed wavelength and the need to consider the fundamental frequency instead of higher harmonics.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the relationship between the harmonic number and the fundamental frequency, suggesting that the original poster reconsider their approach. There is an ongoing exploration of the correct wavelength and its impact on the calculated frequency.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions a lack of familiarity with other equations that could be used, indicating potential constraints in their understanding of the topic. There is also a note of confusion regarding the accuracy of the guessed wavelength.

twiztidmxcn
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
so my problem deals with resonance in standing waves

if you have a standing wave in a long pipe of length 2.90m and that is closed on the left end and open on the right end and the graph of it is as below, with x-axis the position along pipe and y-axis vertical air displacement

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y7/twiztidmxcn/plot.gif

i found the harmonic number to be 5, but that was by guessing at a wavelength

i now need to find frequency using the speed of sound in air as 344m/s

i used the harmonic number and the equation L = (2n-1)*wavelength / 4, pluggin in my length of 2.9m and 5 for n, and then divide 344 by that number

i have gotten a multitude of numbers, including 266.86Hz, but nothing has worked

any help in the right direction would be much appreciated

thx-twiztidmxcn
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you trying to find the fundamental frequency? If so, then picking a harmonic number of 5 is no good, since this is not the fundamental. Use the most simple waveform you have, instead of that mutant fish thing, and you should have a more sensible answer.
 
it just says 'find the pitch (frequency) of the wave using 344m/s as the speed of sound in air'

i haven;t been taught any other kind of equations to use with this. my wavelength is inaccurately guessed and found to be close to right, I am fairly confused
 
twiztidmxcn said:
it just says 'find the pitch (frequency) of the wave using 344m/s as the speed of sound in air'

i haven;t been taught any other kind of equations to use with this. my wavelength is inaccurately guessed and found to be close to right, I am fairly confused

It looks to me like you're on the right track. From your graph it looks like the wavelength is between 2 and 2.5 (one full sinewave).

This corresponds to n = 3. Using your equation I get the wavelength = 2.32m
f=344/2.32 = 148.28Hz
 
I still don't understand why you've chosen a harmonic as the wave, rather than the fundamental.

The frequency that the pipe will resonate at is the fundamental frequency, which happens with the most simple wave, with the largest possible wavelength. At one end of the tube you have a node, the other end; an antinode.
 
brewnog said:
I still don't understand why you've chosen a harmonic as the wave, rather than the fundamental.

The frequency that the pipe will resonate at is the fundamental frequency, which happens with the most simple wave, with the largest possible wavelength. At one end of the tube you have a node, the other end; an antinode.

But look at the graph. It is not resonating at the "fundamental" frequency. The wavelength is less than the length of the tube.
 
learningphysics said:
But look at the graph. It is not resonating at the "fundamental" frequency. The wavelength is less than the length of the tube.

But the OP said that he'd guessed that.
 
learningphysics said:
It looks to me like you're on the right track. From your graph it looks like the wavelength is between 2 and 2.5 (one full sinewave).

This corresponds to n = 3. Using your equation I get the wavelength = 2.32m
f=344/2.32 = 148.28Hz

my friend, i thank you. this made sense, and i worked around with it and finally got how it worked out.

thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K