Why Does Matter Want Lowest Potential Energy?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter petmar
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of why matter tends to occupy the lowest potential energy state. Participants explore this concept from various angles, including physical laws, philosophical implications, and speculative reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Philosophical
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that matter "wants" to occupy the lowest potential energy state due to the laws of physics, particularly referencing the second law of thermodynamics.
  • Others argue that the question of "why" is philosophical rather than scientific, suggesting that some phenomena simply are without requiring further explanation.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of questioning everything, suggesting that while we may not find answers, the inquiry itself is essential to scientific progress.
  • Another participant references Stephen Hawking's notion that understanding the "why" would be akin to knowing the mind of a higher power.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the scientific validity of hypotheses that cannot be tested or refuted, indicating a divide on the nature of scientific inquiry.
  • A participant proposes a speculative idea that the curvature of space might influence energy states, suggesting an elastic principle that drives matter to lower energy states.
  • Another participant challenges this idea, suggesting it may involve circular reasoning, questioning which concept is the cause and which is the effect.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the nature of the inquiry, with some viewing it as a philosophical question and others insisting on its scientific relevance. There are competing views on the validity of hypotheses and the role of questioning in science.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes unresolved assumptions about the definitions of energy states and the implications of physical laws. Some arguments rely on speculative reasoning that has not been empirically tested.

petmar
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
i know that all matter "wants" to go to least potential energy state. the big question is WHY?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
its the laws of physics, i think its the 2nd law of thermodynamics to be specific. there is no 'why?', it just is.

its like asking 'why do opposite charges attract each other?'. they just do, there is no 'why?'.

i think you can use the anthropic principle here. if matter didn't try to occupy the lowest energy state, our universe would not be the way it is and we would not be here to ask the question.
 
I don't completely agree, Fuego.

There must be a reason, we just don't know it. I think we should question everything. We may never be able to determine why, but if we don't even ask the question, then I know we won't answer it.
 
to know why would be to 'know the mind of god' as stephen hawking puts it.
 
This isn't science, it's philosophy. Every hypothesis posted here will be an irrefutable hypothesis. Science can do nothing with those.

- Warren
 
The following is a description of the scientific method. Please pay particular attention to number 2.

1. Observation and description of a phenomenon or group of phenomena.

2. Formulation of an hypothesis to explain the phenomena. In physics, the hypothesis often takes the form of a causal mechanism or a mathematical relation.

3. Use of the hypothesis to predict the existence of other phenomena, or to predict quantitatively the results of new observations.

4. Performance of experimental tests of the predictions by several independent experimenters and properly performed experiments.

It don't get much more scientific then that.
 
I see you do not understand what an irrefutable hypothesis is.

- Warren
 
It must first be posed.
 
Uh yeah... right... I think I'll let myself out of this train wreck of a thread. You morons have fun.

*door slams*

- Warren
 
  • #10
My point isn't to say that we will ever find the reason why for everytime we ask it, but it is how science works.

We wonder why, we come up with a possible reason and then we set out to prove it or at least mathmatically state it.

Without asking "why" we do not have theories or experimentation. Without those we do not have science.
 
  • #11
Originally posted by chroot
Uh yeah... right... I think I'll let myself out of this train wreck of a thread. You morons have fun.

*door slams*

- Warren

Well, I guess the King has left the building.
 
  • #12
i wonder if the door hit him on the way out...

lol
anyways, i was thinking that it might be due to the fact that space is essentially either flat, or of a set curvature, and since energy would distort that curvature, an elastic principle wants all points to go to the least possible energy state... just putting this one out there for the heck of it.

remember: this is a crackpot-less thread. no idea is too crazy.

(take that, chroot! )
 
  • #13
it might be due to the fact that space is essentially either flat, or of a set curvature, and since energy would distort that curvature, an elastic principle wants all points to go to the least possible energy state

that sounds like circular reasoning to me. any elastic principle already depends on the fact that matter tries to occupy lowest energy states.
 
  • #14
true enough...

i wonder, then, which is the cause, and which is the effect, of the elastic principle and the lowest energy state.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
893
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
290
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
688
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K