gravenewworld
- 1,129
- 27
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/04/18/suv.vandalism.reut/index.html
What a waste.
What a waste.
Last edited by a moderator:
The discussion revolves around a news article about an aspiring physicist sentenced for vandalism against SUVs, prompting a debate on the intelligence and judgment of physicists as a group. Participants explore themes of stereotypes, humor, and the implications of actions taken by individuals within a profession.
Participants express a mix of humor and serious critique, with no clear consensus on the implications of the actions of the aspiring physicist or the broader characterization of physicists. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the stereotypes and judgments being made.
Participants reference the lack of punctuation in the original post's title as a point of contention, indicating a focus on communication style rather than the substantive issues raised.
gravenewworld said:TSK TSK TSK So you Physicists aren't that bright after all
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/04/18/suv.vandalism.reut/index.html
What a waste.
Do you think the physicists would ever do the same for you?cronxeh said:im in engineering and I am defending physicists.. unbelivable what this world is coming to![]()
Would you then please, for Chissakes, use smilies? I suspected a less-than-serious approach to that based upon a couple of your previous posts, but it's far from a 'given'.gravenewworld said:LOL calm down people, it was a little joke... (how iz mi grammar?)
cronxeh said:im in engineering and I am defending physicists.. unbelivable what this world is coming to![]()
gravenewworld said:(how iz mi grammar?)
danger said:edit: PS: Yur gramer kinda xucks.![]()
The reference wasn't to that quote; it was to the lack of punctuation in the title.Smurf said:Do I have to point out the difference between grammar, spelling and punctuation to you again?
Math Is Hard said:Do you think the physicists would ever do the same for you?