Solving Quantum Computation: Diagonalizing Y & Z Operators

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter James Jackson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operators
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the diagonalization of quantum operators Y and Z defined on C^2. The diagonal form of operator Z is established as Z = |0⟩⟨0| - |1⟩⟨1|, with eigenvalues {1, -1} and corresponding eigenvectors {|0⟩, |1⟩}. The Dirac form of operator Y is represented in matrix form as Y = (0 -i; i 0). It is clarified that the Dirac form of an operator is equivalent to its diagonal form when dealing with diagonal matrices, providing a crucial insight for quantum computation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and linear algebra
  • Familiarity with Dirac notation and quantum operators
  • Knowledge of eigenvalues and eigenvectors
  • Experience with matrix representations of operators
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of eigenvalues and eigenvectors in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the spectral decomposition of operators
  • Explore the implications of Dirac notation in quantum computation
  • Investigate the relationship between matrix representations and operator forms
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum computation.

James Jackson
Messages
162
Reaction score
0
I'm just looking at another quantum computation question. It is stated like so:

The operators Y and Z on [tex]C^2[/tex] are defined by:

[tex]Y|0\rangle =i|1\rangle ; Y|1\rangle = -i|0\rangle[/tex]
[tex]Z|0\rangle = |0\rangle ; Z|1\rangle = -|1\rangle[/tex]

Write Z in diagonal form
Write Y in Dirac form with respect to the basis [tex]\{ 0\rangle , |1\rangle\}[/tex]

Now, I'm confusing myself something silly. I'm under the impression that the diagonal form of an operator is given by:

[tex]A=\sum \lambda_{n}|n\rangle\langle n|[/tex]

where [tex]|n\rangle[/tex] are the eigenvectors and [tex]\lambda_n[/tex] are the eigenvalues of A.

But I would also take this to be the Dirac form, so I'm clearly missing something.

The eigenvalues of Z are clearly [tex]\{1,-1\}[/tex] with eigenvectors [tex]\{ |0\rangle ,|1\rangle\}[/tex], so the diagonal form is [tex]Z=|0\rangle\langle 0|-|1\rangle\langle 1|[/tex].

I suppose my question breaks down to 'What is meant by the Dirac form of an operator?'

Any hints?

Edited to remove me being stupid and working out eigenvectors incorrectly.

Edit: Or, by Dirac form of an operator, do they mean the matrix representation which, for Y, is given by:

[tex]Y=\left(\begin{array}{cc}0&-i\\i&0\end{array}\right)[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
My guess is that by "diagonal form" they mean write Z as a diagonal matrix. And by "Dirac form" they mean write Y as a sum of projection operators as you did for Z. But I agree with you, in that I would say the "Dirac Form" version of Z written in terms of eigenvectors is also in "diagonal form".
 
To anyone who's remotely interested, it transpires that given an operator, A, in matrix respresentation, then the Dirac form of the operator is:

[tex]\hat A=\sum_{ij} A_{ij} |i\rangle\langle j|[/tex]

and given the eigenvalues [itex]\lambda_i[/itex] and eigenvectors [itex]|\lambda_i\rangle[/itex] of an operator, the diagonal representation is (of course):

[tex]\hat A = \sum_i \lambda_i |\lambda_i\rangle\langle\lambda_i |[/tex]

As a 'learning point', note that the Dirac form of an operator is identical to the diagonal form for a diagonal matrix. An obvious result, but perhaps it will be useful for others.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
747
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K