Solving Polarization Formula Problem: Get Help Now

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving three polarizing filters and the intensity of light passing through them. The original poster is trying to determine the intensity of light after removing the second polarizer, given the intensity after all three filters is 76.5 W/cm². The subject area is polarization and light intensity calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the implications of the angles of the polarizers and how to apply Malus' Law. They question whether the intensity of 76.5 W/cm² should be considered as I_max or the intensity after passing through all filters. Some participants clarify the positioning of the first filter and the meaning of the given intensity.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, exploring different interpretations of the setup and the use of the given intensity. Guidance has been offered regarding the application of Malus' Law and the relationship between the filters, but no consensus has been reached on the specific values to use for calculations.

Contextual Notes

There is some uncertainty regarding the definition of I_max and how it relates to the intensity given after passing through the filters. The original poster expresses confusion about the problem statement and the implications of the angles of the filters.

sghaussi
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Hello! I'm having difficulty solving this problem, I was wondering if you can help me solve it.

Three polarizing filters are stacked, with the polarizing axis of the second and third filters at angles of 28.4 and 57.0, respectively, to that of the first. If unpolarized light is incident on the stack, the light has an intensity of 76.5 W/cm^2 after it passes through the stack.

If the incident intensity is kept constant, what is the intensity of the light after it has passed through the stack if the second polarizer is removed?



I know I need to use the formula: I = I_max cos^2 phi

Do I solve for I_max first given the intensity 76.5 W/cm^2 then change the angle to fit the second situation? And what do they mean by "light is incident" on the stack? Does that mean I am looking for I or I_max?

I've read the section on Polarization 5 times so far and I still don't understand this problem. I hope you can help me. Thank you. =)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's one way to approach it. Call the intensity of the light after passing through the first filter [itex]I_1[/itex]. Now use your formula (which is Malus' Law) to calculate the intensity of the light for two cases:
(a) after passing through filter 2, then through filter 3
(b) after passing directly through filter 3​
Compare (a) with (b), realizing that the intensity you calculate for (a) is given as 76.5 W/cm^2.
 
Does this mean that filter one is positioned at zero degrees? Also, am I supposed to be using 76.5 W/cm^2 as my I_max or is that just the intensity given after the light has passed through all three filters? Do I just use the given intensity for find I_max? Thanks for your quick response - it's greatly appreciated!
 
sghaussi said:
Does this mean that filter one is positioned at zero degrees?
Yes.
Also, am I supposed to be using 76.5 W/cm^2 as my I_max or is that just the intensity given after the light has passed through all three filters?
As the problem stated: "...the light has an intensity of 76.5 W/cm^2 after it passes through the stack"
Do I just use the given intensity for find I_max?
Do what I suggested and see what happens.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
3K