Trigonometric Roots and Substitutions: Solving Equations in Terms of Pi

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gughanath
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the cubic equation 2x^3-5x^2-4x+3=0, with initial roots incorrectly identified as x=-1, 3, and 1. The correct roots are identified as x=-1, 3, and 1/2. The second part of the problem involves substituting x=cos(t) into the equation, leading to the need to solve for cos(t)=-1 and cos(t)=1/2. This results in multiple solutions for t, with the possibility of complex solutions if cos(t)=3 is considered. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately finding roots and understanding trigonometric identities in solving equations.
Gughanath
Messages
118
Reaction score
0
The first part of this question was to find the roots of the equation 2x^3-5x^2-4x+3=0 i got x=-1, 3, and 1.

but then the second part completely confused me
b) Hence, by substituting x=cost solve the equation 2cos^3t-5cos^2t -4cost+3=0 for 0<t<2"pie", giving your answer in radians in terms of pie.

PLEASE HELP! :confused: :confused: :confused:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Can you solve cos(t)=-1?

Oh, you've solve the cubic equation wrong, 1 of the solutions for x does not work.
 
Last edited:
Gughanath said:
giving your answer in radians in terms of pie.

PLEASE HELP!

The roots are : x=-1,3,1/2.

Just solve : cos(t)=-1 and cos(t)=1/2...this gives of course an infinity of real answers...

If you allow complex numbers, then you can solve cos(t)=3...

NB : You're great, with your help I know how the english pronounciation of \pi double explain it's origin :biggrin:
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top