The Five Dimensions of Gravity - almanassier.com

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Raaid Mustafa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimensions
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a proposed alternative theory of gravity that claims to add to Newton's Law of Gravitation. Participants critique the validity and coherence of the ideas presented, particularly focusing on the mathematical formulation and conceptual underpinnings of the new theory.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant introduces a new formula for gravity that is claimed to complement Newton's Law, suggesting a different approach to understanding gravitational forces.
  • Another participant challenges the mathematical validity of the proposed formula, arguing that it does not conform to established dimensional analysis and is nonsensical.
  • A third participant defends their position, stating that their theory does not conflict with Newton's Law and proposes that it offers a different perspective on how gravity is created, emphasizing a principle of opposites.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the relevance and coherence of the new theory, with one suggesting that the discussion may not belong in the Theory Development forum.
  • Another participant comments on the lack of clarity in the original proposal, asserting that understanding Newtonian mechanics is essential before dismissing it.
  • There is a humorous exchange regarding the nature of the proposed "five dimensions," with some participants suggesting it may be a misunderstanding of coding rather than a serious scientific concept.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the validity of the proposed theory, with some finding it nonsensical and others attempting to defend its merit. No consensus is reached regarding the acceptance or rejection of the new ideas presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants express concerns about the mathematical formulation of the new theory and its alignment with established physics principles. The discussion highlights a lack of clarity in the proposed concepts and the necessity for a solid understanding of Newtonian mechanics for meaningful critique.

what is the five dimensions?

  • img

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • html

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Smilies

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • vB code

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
Raaid Mustafa
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
The Gravity has another formula which Add to Newton's Law and explain the facts behaind creating the Gravity in an object Like Earth or Moon , etc. check the details at http://almanassier.com/gravity1.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
First, this should be in the Theory Developement Forum. Second, I'm always one to openly consider new ideas, but I didn't see one thing in that whole site that made any sense! If you did indeed learn Newton's Law of Gravitation, there is no way it will seem correct if you don't go ahead and learn the rest of his theories and math. At one point you say:

"Gravity Force=(Mass quantity/surface area)(time of one rotation)"

(or something to that effect) but if you knew anything about mechanics you'd know that forces are in Newtons, and a dimensional analysis of the equation shows that you apparently think this:
N=kg/(m^2)*(rot/sec)
which means:
N=kg/(s*m^2)
which is nonsense! Everyone knows:
N=kg*m/(s^2)
 
Last edited:
I did not mean any harm to you

Dear Jonathan

First may be you are right, this is not the site I had to write to because I thought I'm Writing to open mind people. Second if you spend some more time to read before you make your judgments this make you wise man , sorry for you
I am not interested about religion as much I interested in explaining the gravity in a way will not clash with Newton’s Law which I do believe it. But as an introduction I am saying that the contrary principle (every thing must have an opposite), will be as a test for the accuracy of any Law, so that the Law which I provide on my site had been tested positively accurate with Newton’s Law in the end results. My Law is just an addition to explain how the gravity created and of course because I used the repelling , but not Attraction this will make the gravity units are deferent than what Newton used, but the main thing it gives the same ratio between Earth gravity to Moon gravity which is 6/1 and in any other objects . Thanks you
 
I am not even sure if this nonsense is worthy of TD. My first impulse was to delete.
 
Originally posted by Integral
I am not even sure if this nonsense is worthy of TD. My first impulse was to delete.
Very good impulse
 
I don't know about you guys, but I think the five dimensions is vB code all the way!

- Warren
 
Yes, the poll made no sense. Mr. Mustafa, it doesn't matter whether it is repelling or attracting, all forces are measured in Newtons. I can say for sure that until you learn Newtonian Mechanics you should not believe it to be wrong. I at least gave your theory a chance, at which point I noticed the nonsense. How can you dismiss something as not true if you don't even know what it is?
 
Originally posted by chroot
I don't know about you guys, but I think the five dimensions is vB code all the way!

- Warren
Damnit, Warren, its html and you know it!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
5K