- 1,118
- 1
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/news/2005-05-10/rsa-200/
Damn, my record stands at factoring a semiprimes of about 95 digits lol.
Damn, my record stands at factoring a semiprimes of about 95 digits lol.
Last edited:
The discussion revolves around the factoring of RSA-200, a large semiprime number, and the challenges associated with it compared to other types of numbers, such as Mersenne numbers. Participants explore the properties of the factors, the methods used for factorization, and the implications of the achievement in the context of cryptography.
Participants express varying viewpoints on the properties of the factors and the methods of factorization, with no clear consensus on the best approach or the implications of the findings. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the comparison of factoring methods and the specific challenges posed by RSA-200.
Some claims about the properties of the factors depend on specific mathematical assumptions and definitions that are not universally agreed upon. The discussion includes references to external sources for further information on the factorization methods and the historical context of RSA-200.
Readers interested in number theory, cryptography, and the mathematical challenges of factoring large semiprime numbers may find this discussion relevant.
You can factor Mersenne numbers from the formulae alone assume the exponent isn't prime. Also there is a specific test for testing the primality of Mersenne numbers: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Lucas-LehmerTest.htmlgazzo said:How much different are these to factoring mersenne numbers?
What makes them so much harder? :S
gazzo said:How much different are these to factoring mersenne numbers?
What makes them so much harder? :S
The factors p and q will have the probably have the properties:saltydog said:I believe also they're chosen to be as far apart as possible. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the closer they are together, the easier (relatively speaking), it is to factor the composite.
Zurtex said:The factors p and q will have the probably have the properties:
[tex](pq)^{\frac{1}{3}} < p < q[/tex]
Also it is highly likely that:
[tex]\alpha p < q < \beta p \quad \text{where} \quad \alpha \approx 2 \, \, \text{and} \, \, \beta \approx 10[/tex]
These are 2 properties I found highly useful to reduce chance of factorization, or at least when I studied factoring such numbers.
Well actually for large numbers the 2nd one implies the 1st one and a lot stronger conditions, however the 1st one is more logically important, the 2nd one makes sense when you try and think about how people might attack it. You will see that my inequalities hold for RSA-200.saltydog said:Very nice Zurtex. Think I'll check your properties out with RSA-200. Thanks.
Zurtex said:The factors p and q will have the probably have the properties:
[tex](pq)^{\frac{1}{3}} < p < q[/tex]
Also it is highly likely that:
[tex]\alpha p < q < \beta p \quad \text{where} \quad \alpha \approx 2 \, \, \text{and} \, \, \beta \approx 10[/tex]
These are 2 properties I found highly useful to reduce chance of factorization, or at least when I studied factoring such numbers.