Likely Winner of Women's Shooting Contest

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter himurakenshin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a probability problem involving a shooting contest among three participants, A, B, and C, each with different shooting accuracies. The participants explore the likelihood of each contestant winning based on their shooting order and accuracy, with a focus on calculating conditional probabilities after each shooting event.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests calculating the probability that A kills B, considering various scenarios and the geometric sequence involved.
  • Another participant questions the assumptions regarding the shooting order and what happens after one contestant is killed.
  • It is proposed that the shooting order is assumed to be sequential, with the surviving contestant shooting next.
  • A participant claims to have found that B has the highest probability of winning, inviting verification from others.
  • One participant provides their estimates of winning probabilities: C at 42%, B at 40%, and A at 18%, noting the quick nature of their calculations.
  • Another participant confirms the previous claim regarding B's winning probability.
  • A participant points out that the total probabilities calculated by another add up to over 100%, indicating a potential error in calculations.
  • One participant suggests that there may be a mistake in the calculations related to the scenario where A dies first.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the calculations and assumptions regarding the shooting order and probabilities. There is no consensus on the correct probabilities or the assumptions made in the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not fully resolved the implications of the shooting order after a contestant is killed, and there are unresolved mathematical steps in the probability calculations presented.

himurakenshin
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Three women A,b,c are involved in a contest with the following rules. A shoots B, if B survives, B shoots C and if C survives, C shoots A. A is 25% accurate, B is 45% and C is 75%. Who is most likely to win if the women continue to shoot in order and in turn. (Who is most likely to be alive)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First find the probability that A kills B when there are still 3. This will be .25 (first shot) + .75 * .55 * .25 * .25 (second shot: you get this because for A killing B on second shot with still 3 people, A must miss first shot, then B must miss first shot, then C must miss first shot, then A must hit second shot) + .75 * .55 * .25 * .75 * .55 * .25 * .25 (third shot) + ..., basically the sum of a geometric sequence.

Then find the probability of each player winning given A just killed B.

Continue in this fashion for B killing C and for C killing A and deal with the conditional probabilities appropriately.
 
The statement of the problem has a gap. What happens after one person is killed? Who shoots next? Do they take turns? Is the killing prob. the same?
 
It's probably assumed that they go in order, so if someone just shot and killed then the other surviving person shoots next. The hit probabilities are stated.
 
When I solved the answer, I find that B has the highest probability of winning, can anyone verify this.

Also once on person is dead they shoot each other
 
I may be wrong but my estimates are that C has a 42% chance of winning, B has a 40% chance of winning and A has a 18% chance of winning. Though I did that very quickly so I could have easily made a mistake.

Steven
 
Confirmed, snoble.
 
this is the workings as how I got the answer that B has the highest probability - can somebody tell me where I have gone wrong?
 

Attachments

One thing I can tell you is that your probabilities add up to 110.6%, which just can't be right...
 
  • #10
Under B, where A dies first, you must have punched in the numbers wrong.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
13K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K