Finding the Integral of YdX: A Different Approach

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Iraides Belandria
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Carnot Machine Work
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the integral of the expression y dx, where y is an independent function that varies between 4 and 8. Participants explore different approaches to this integral, including its application in the context of a Carnot machine operating between two temperature reservoirs.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that the integral of y dx, given that y does not depend on x, could be expressed as ((4+8)/2) x.
  • Another participant suggests that the integral evaluates to yx + h(y), indicating that y's variation should be considered at the end of the calculation.
  • A different viewpoint argues that if y varies with respect to x, then y does depend on x, challenging the initial assumption of independence.
  • One participant mentions using the fundamental theorem of calculus to evaluate the integral, but does not provide a specific resolution to the problem.
  • A participant introduces a scenario involving a Carnot machine, discussing the work done in terms of the integral of (1-Tb/Ta) dQ, where Tb varies between 400 and 800 K, and questions the appropriateness of using the arithmetic mean for Tb.
  • Another participant critiques the modeling of the scenario, stating that Q and Tb cannot be functionally independent, suggesting a need for further clarification.
  • A later reply presents a different solution using the basic definition of integration, proposing a method to express the integral in terms of the average of y values over the interval, while expressing uncertainty about the validity of this approach.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the independence of y and x, the appropriate method for evaluating the integral, and the modeling of the Carnot machine scenario. The discussion remains unresolved with no consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the independence of variables and the functional relationships between Q and Tb. The discussion includes unresolved mathematical steps and varying interpretations of the integral's evaluation.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying calculus, thermodynamics, or anyone exploring the mathematical modeling of physical systems.

Iraides Belandria
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
integration of

Dear people of this section.

Suppose you have two indepenfent functions x and y and we need to find the integral of the following expression y dx ,and y does not depends upon x, but y varies between 4 and 8 in the interval of integration. ¿ Do you think that the value of the integration is (( 4+8)/2 ) x ?
 
Science news on Phys.org
[tex]\int y dx= yx + h(y)[/tex]

does that make sense? as far as y varying from 4 to 8... umm... i guess you would just plug those at the end...
 
we need to find the integral of the following expression y dx ,and y does not depends upon x

This statement shows that the integral will evaluate to [itex]yx + C [/tex]<br /> <br /> <b>y varies between 4 and 8 in the interval of integration</b><br /> If y varies as plotted against x, then y does depend on x. If it varies when plotted against a different variable, then this information has no meaning for the given problem.[/itex]
 
In other words, you just use the fundamental theorem of calculus like you always would:

[tex] \int_a^b f_x(x, y) \, dx = f(b, y) - f(a, y)[/tex]
 
In order to be clear my qustion to you, I am going to explain better the origin of this thread. I am interested to find the work of a carnot machine that operates between a hot reservoir at 800k (constant temperature) an a series of cold reservoirs whose temperature varies from 400 t0 800K. From thermodynamics the work, W, will be

W = Integral (1-Tb/Ta) dQ
where Tb is the variable temperature of the cold reservoir, Ta is the constant temperature of the hot reservoir and Q is the heat input. Solving we get

W= Integral dQ - integral (Tb/Ta)dQ = Q- (1/Ta)integral Tb dQ

Since Tb and Q are independent, we obtain

W= Q-Tb Q

To get a number a need to introduce a value for Q and Tb. ¿ What value do I choose for Tb if it varies between 400 and 800?. Q is equal to 2000 calories. Because of this I said, well, Tb is the arithmetic mean of 400 and 800 K, or Tb= (400 + 800)/2. ? Is this reasonable, honest?
 
Ack, I just noticed the section. This isn't even a number theory question to begin with! (Should be calculus & analysis, if you wanted to put it in the math forum)


However, your problem appears to be your modelling of the scenario. Q and Tb cannot be functionally independent, since both depend on time. (Unless one of them is a constant) I'm going to punt this over to the physics section -- should be someone over there who knows exactly what you should be doing.
 
Dear Hurkyl, since I don´t have any answer, yet. Let me to present a different solution to the original question of the thread. In other words, let us find the integral of YdX using the basic definition of integration. As you suggest Y and X are not functionally independent, but we don´t know how they depend. We know that X varies between a and b. Then , we can define an infinite set of equals intervals delta X = (b-a)/n, where n is the number of intervals. n tends to infinite. then,

integral Y d X = Summatory (Y1 delta X+ Y2 deltaX + Y3 delta X+ ...Yn delta X)

Y1, Y2, Y3,....Yn, are the Y values in each interval delta X.

Since each delta X = (b-a)/n, we get

Integral Y dX = (b-a) Summmatory ( Y1+ Y2+ Y3+...Yn) /n
where n tends to infinite

But Summatory (Y1+ Y2+Y3+ ...+ Yn) / n is the arithmetic mean or the average of an infinite set of values , as I will prove now.
By the mean value theorem

Summatory ( Y1+Y2+Y3+...+Yn) = 1/ ( Yb -Ya) Integral YdY = (Yb +Ya) / 2

where Ya and Yb are the initial and final values of Y.
Therefore,

Integral YdX= (b-a)(Ya+Yb)/2
This final result coincides with the empirical value I initially suggested.

Now, since I am not an expert mathematician, I have doubts about the validity of this demonstration, and I appreciate very much your comments and suggestions. If this is correct I think I can apply it to the Carnot machine.
Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K