Einsteins though experiment and e=mc^2

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter uraknai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    E=mc^2 Experiment
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around Einstein's thought experiment related to the derivation of the equation E=mc², exploring its accuracy and implications. Participants examine the mechanics of an isolated box emitting photons and the resulting effects on mass and energy, as well as the historical context of Einstein's reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Historical

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a thought experiment involving a box in free space emitting photons and calculates the resulting recoil and energy-mass relationship, questioning the accuracy of this representation of Einstein's work.
  • Another participant asserts that the described thought experiment is not exactly how Einstein presented it and provides a link to a more accurate version.
  • A participant references Max Born's discussion of the experiment, noting the displacement caused by radiation and the implications for the conservation of momentum.
  • There is a mention of the complexity of the thought experiment, indicating that some participants find the concepts challenging to grasp.
  • Another participant comments on the speed of the "kick" from the radiation traveling through the medium, suggesting further nuances in the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the accuracy of the initial description of Einstein's thought experiment, with some agreeing that it is not entirely correct while others provide alternative interpretations. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the precise details and implications of the thought experiment.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the interpretation of the thought experiment may depend on specific definitions and assumptions about mass and energy, as well as the historical context of Einstein's work. There are unresolved aspects regarding the mechanics of the system and the implications of the radiation's behavior.

uraknai
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I came across a book a few weeks ago that tried to explain how einstein "derived" the formula and wasn't sure how accurate the description was. I'll write it out as best I can so you can either pick faults with it or tell me it's correct:

In Einsteins thought experiment there is an isolated box in free space of length L and mass M. Photons are emitted from one with energy E and velocity c ( and so the photons have momentum E/c) causing the box to recoil with velocity v = -E/Mc.

After time dt, the photons hit the wall bringing the box to rest so the box has moved a distance of dx wher dx = v dt = -EL/Mc^2.

Since the box is an isolated system the centre of mass and its contents haven't moved and so the radiation has carried the equivalent of a mass m s.t,

mL + M dx = 0

so mL - EL/c^2 = 0

by factoring out L we get we get m - E/c^2 = 0

so E = mc^2


Was this thought experiment just a way for Einstein to deduce what the relationship between relativistic mass and energy might be so he could work on a more rigorous proof or was the book making things up :confused:.

Also, could someone explain what the paragraph highlighted in red means :smile:

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
uraknai said:
I came across a book a few weeks ago that tried to explain how einstein "derived" the formula and wasn't sure how accurate the description was. I'll write it out as best I can so you can either pick faults with it or tell me it's correct:

In Einsteins thought experiment there is an isolated box in free space of length L and mass M. Photons are emitted from one with energy E and velocity c ( and so the photons have momentum E/c) causing the box to recoil with velocity v = -E/Mc.

After time dt, the photons hit the wall bringing the box to rest so the box has moved a distance of dx wher dx = v dt = -EL/Mc^2.

Since the box is an isolated system the centre of mass and its contents haven't moved and so the radiation has carried the equivalent of a mass m s.t,

mL + M dx = 0

so mL - EL/c^2 = 0

by factoring out L we get we get m - E/c^2 = 0

so E = mc^2


Was this thought experiment just a way for Einstein to deduce what the relationship between relativistic mass and energy might be so he could work on a more rigorous proof or was the book making things up :confused:.

Also, could someone explain what the paragraph highlighted in red means :smile:

Thanks
That is not exactly Einstein's thought experiment. I posted the correct one in its entirety here

http://www.geocities.com/physics_world/sr/einsteins_box.htm

The part in red only means that since the center of mass must remain constant and radiation left one side and the box moved then the light must carry mass with it. Einstein then concluded that light has mass. He didn't state that explicitly in that part of the paper. He did state it in the second part of the paper though.

Pete
 
The experiment is discussed by Max Born, "Einstein's Theory of Relativity." Yes, the box, or railway car, is displaced by the transmission of radiation. On Page 284, it says "Then A experiences a recoil E/c... The displacement of the tube is X=EL/Mc^2.

Then Born goes on to say,"Now the bodies A and B may be interchanged (this may be done without using exterior forces). ...According to ordinary mechanics the tube as a whole must suffer no displacement..." Yes, but Born postulates that two men are situated in the tube, who exchange similar equipment from one side to the other in order to restore things as they originally were.
 
Wow...I never know it was THAT complex.
 
Gamecubesupreme: Wow...I never know it was THAT complex.

Well, another matter that Born gets into is that the "kick" from the radiation travels through the metal of the "railway car" at less than the speed of light.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
7K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K