What is a damping. Text books say damping is proportional to velocity.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of damping, particularly its definition, proportionality to velocity, and practical applications. Participants explore the nature of damping in various contexts, including mechanical systems and electrical circuits, while questioning the parameters that could define damping beyond velocity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why damping is defined as proportional to velocity rather than force or other parameters, seeking clarity on its actual function and applications.
  • Another participant shares practical experiences from motorcycle racing, emphasizing the critical role of damping in suspension systems to prevent uncontrollable bouncing.
  • A participant describes the mechanics of dampers, explaining how fluid dynamics create a restraining force and noting the adjustment of orifice size affects damping rates.
  • It is noted that damping can be viewed as a form of friction, which may vary in its proportionality to velocity, with some forms being constant and others proportional to the square of velocity.
  • Further detail is provided on the nonlinearity of damping forces in automotive dampers, which can be modeled as piecewise functions that differ based on velocity direction.
  • One participant elaborates on the mathematical representation of damping in oscillatory systems, highlighting the importance of a first-order term for diminishing amplitude over time.
  • Equations describing damped, driven oscillators are presented, with emphasis on the role of the damping coefficient in preventing arbitrarily large amplitudes and its relationship to energy dissipation.
  • Another participant mentions that damping can also occur in electrical circuits through resistive components, drawing parallels between mechanical and electrical damping.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the definition and implications of damping, with no consensus reached on whether damping should be considered solely proportional to velocity or if other parameters could be relevant. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the broader implications of damping in different systems.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the complexity of damping behavior, noting that it can depend on factors such as fluid density, orifice size, and the specific context of the system being analyzed. The mathematical representations discussed also indicate that assumptions about linearity and proportionality may not hold in all cases.

chandran
Messages
137
Reaction score
1
What is a damping. Text books say damping is proportional to velocity. Why not damping is proportional force? or why not damping proportional to some other parameter. What does damping actually do ? Is there any practical
application ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Practical applications!

I race motorcycles - try doing that with no damping in the suspension! If the damping fails, the wheels bounce up and down like you wouldn't believe and the bike is unraceable.

The applications are really too numerous to list, but vehicle suspension is a good one. Even some bridges (London's Millenium bridge) use damping.
 
In most cases, a dampener is a piston, chamber and a fluid. In the direction of movement, the fluid is forced through a small orifice. This produces a restraining force against the direction of motion. The resistance comes from the back pressure created by forcing the fluid through the orifice. That will be a function of not only the speed of the motion, but the density of the fluid and the size of the orifice.

A very common application is the dampener on your screen door. There is an adjustment on it to control the rate of dampening. With that adjustment you are changing the orifice effective area.

You can find more information if you look under the term "dashpot."
 
Damping is just a form of friction. Friction converts an organized form of energy into heat. It can be a constant (as in a tire against a road), proportional to velocity (as in shock absorbers), or proportional to velocity squared (as in turbulent losses). Usually only the middle one is called damping.
 
krab said:
...It can be a constant (as in a tire against a road), proportional to velocity (as in shock absorbers), or proportional to velocity squared (as in turbulent losses). Usually only the middle one is called damping.
I never knew that Krab - thanks.
:smile:
 
To add a little practical detail, most dampers exert forces which are functions mainly of velocity, although that function is usually nonlinear. Automotive dampers can often be modeled as piecewise functions which become linear for large velocities (although they have very different slopes for positive and negative velocity). The lower-velocity function is usually quadratic (again, it is completely different depending on the direction of motion). A simpler damper would leave the car either uncontrollable or so stiff as to be literally painful to drive. The precise forms of these curves have a huge effect on a car's overall feel and performance.
 
More generally, damping is caused by any element that dissipate energy into heat. In an electrical circuit, damping is provided by the resistive components. In a mechanical system, damping is provided by friction.
 
chandran said:
What is a damping. Text books say damping is proportional to velocity. Why not damping is proportional force? or why not damping proportional to some other parameter. What does damping actually do ? Is there any practical
application ?
Damping refers to the force that limits the amplitude of a vibration - a simple harmonic oscillation.

The solution to a second order differential equation without a first order term is constant amplitude simple harmonic motion. So if the 'damping' were to be proportional to force, or acceleration, the 'damping force' would simply modify the co-efficient of the second order term. The character of the motion would not change - it would still be constant amplitude sinusoidal motion.

Only by adding a first order term - ie. proportional to the first time derivative of position or velocity - does the amplitude of the vibration diminish with time.

AM
 
A damped, driven oscillator is described by the equation :

[tex]m \ddot{x} - c \dot{x} - kx = f_0 sin(\omega_0 t + \phi)[/tex]

Here, c is called the damping coefficient, and accounts for dissipation in a non-ideal spring.
 
  • #10
Gokul43201 said:
A damped, driven oscillator is described by the equation :

[tex]m \ddot{x} - c \dot{x} - kx = f_0 sin(\omega_0 t + \phi)[/tex]

Here, c is called the damping coefficient, and accounts for dissipation in a non-ideal spring.
The solution of which is a function of arbitrarily large amplitude as c approaches 0 (assuming the forcing frequency [itex]\omega_0[/itex] is the natural frequency of the oscillator [itex]\sqrt{k/m}[/itex]). Hence, c is the damping coefficient. It prevents the amplitude from becoming arbitrarily large.

AM
 
  • #11
Gokul43201 said:
A damped, driven oscillator is described by the equation :

[tex]m \ddot{x} - c \dot{x} - kx = f_0 sin(\omega_0 t + \phi)[/tex]

Here, c is called the damping coefficient, and accounts for dissipation in a non-ideal spring.
The forcing function does not need to be sinusoidal. A step function or a dirac delta function can initiate oscillations that are damped only if c is not zero. The equation should read:
[tex]m \ddot{x} - c \dot{x} - kx = f(t)[/tex]
By the way, the damping acts only on the natural oscilations. The response to the forcing sinusoid is another sinusoid of the same frequency but different phase and amplitude, but that amplitude is maintained without damping.
Also the oscillation can originate from a RLC circuit, where the resistive component R is responsible for the damping. In an electric circuit
[tex]-c = \frac{1}{RC}[/tex] or [tex]-c = \frac{R}{L}[/tex] or a combination of those.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
694
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K