Wind Tunnel Apparatus: Why Strain Gages Preferred Over Pressure Sensors

  • Thread starter Thread starter sid_galt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wind Wind tunnel
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the use of strain gauges versus pressure sensors in wind tunnel measurements, particularly focusing on the reasons for the preference of strain gauges and the implications of measuring forces in different directions. Participants explore the sensitivity, performance, and limitations of both types of sensors in the context of structural and fluid dynamics analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that strain gauges are preferred because they are directly related to local stress, which is of interest to structural engineers, while pressure sensors focus on fluid behavior.
  • Others argue that the signal-to-noise ratio of pressure transducers is higher than that of strain gauges, which may affect measurement reliability.
  • It is noted that strain gauges can measure strain in one direction, but the maximum stress often occurs in one direction, raising questions about the effects of stresses in other directions on measurements.
  • Some participants mention the use of bi-directional strain gauges to resolve strains in multiple dimensions.
  • There is a discussion about the performance of capacitive pressure sensors, with some participants noting their sensitivity and application in high-accuracy situations, while others express uncertainty about their practical use.
  • Concerns are raised about the size and deflection of capacitive sensors affecting their performance and the ability to measure static versus dynamic pressure.
  • Some participants question the ability of capacitive sensors to measure both static and dynamic pressure, with differing opinions on the feasibility of such measurements.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the advantages and limitations of strain gauges and pressure sensors, particularly regarding their sensitivity and measurement capabilities. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives on the effectiveness of each sensor type.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to the assumptions made about sensor performance, the dependency on specific applications, and the unresolved nature of how stresses in different directions affect strain gauge measurements.

sid_galt
Messages
503
Reaction score
1
Why aren't pressure sensors used for measuring forces in a wind tunnel? Why are strain gauges preferred? Is it because strain gages are sensitive?

The lift and drag plates attached to the stinger should feel strain in two directions. How come the strain gage manages to measure the strain of only one direction?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
sid_galt said:
Why aren't pressure sensors used for measuring forces in a wind tunnel? Why are strain gauges preferred? Is it because strain gages are sensitive?

The lift and drag plates attached to the stinger should feel strain in two directions. How come the strain gage manages to measure the strain of only one direction?
In answer to first question, it is the forces (stresses) on the structure which are of interest to the structural engineer, while the aerodynamicist or fluids engineer is interested in the fluid behavior. The strain gage is directly related to the local stress (think constitutive model). Also, the signal-to-noise ratio of the pressure transducer is much higher than the strain gage.

Regarding second question, a modeler usually wishes to resolve the strains in two or three dimensions (directions) in order to develop a constutive model. Think of how one models in 2D or 3D. However, most often, the maximum stress is in one direction (think von Mises or Tresca).

One can use bi-directional strain gages.

Reference - http://www.isa.org/Template.cfm?Section=View_All_Standards3&template=/Ecommerce/ProductDisplay.cfm&ProductID=3396
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronuc said:
Also, the signal-to-noise ratio of the pressure transducer is much higher than the strain gage.

Thanks for the reply.

Regarding pressure sensors, how is the performance of a capacitance pressure sensor? I have read they are very sensitive and can measure a large range of pressures.

Astronuc said:
Regarding second question, a modeler usually wishes to resolve the strains in two or three dimensions (directions) in order to develop a constutive model. Think of how one models in 2D or 3D. However, most often, the maximum stress is in one direction (think von Mises or Tresca).

The maximum stress is mostly in one direction. But if unidirectional strain gages are put on an object to measure strains in say the x direction, will the a stress in the y direction affect the measurement?
 
sid_galt said:
Regarding pressure sensors, how is the performance of a capacitance pressure sensor? I have read they are very sensitive and can measure a large range of pressures.
True perhaps. I am not up on capacitive pressure sensors. However, the key is the structural response to the fluid excitation. One could read local pressure fluctuations, but get very little strain at the location, say on an automobile body or aircraft foil.

sid_galt said:
The maximum stress is mostly in one direction. But if unidirectional strain gages are put on an object to measure strains in say the x direction, will the a stress in the y direction affect the measurement?
One would use an x-oriented strain gage and a y-oriented strain gage on a surface. Ideally, the strain gage has very low stiffness compared to the material substrate, otherwise the strain gage could significantly affect the results and would have to be factored into the analysis.
 
sid_galt said:
Regarding pressure sensors, how is the performance of a capacitance pressure sensor? I have read they are very sensitive and can measure a large range of pressures.
Capacitive sensors, from what I have seen, are usually used in very high accuracy situations, like calibration standards and such. I can't think of a situation where I have used one myself. I pretty much stick to strain gauge based transducers. I have heard that they tend to be larger because the change in capacitance under load is pretty small, so the need to have a large enough deflection in the diaphragm to get a signal that doesn't get lost in the system noise.

sid_galt said:
The maximum stress is mostly in one direction. But if unidirectional strain gages are put on an object to measure strains in say the x direction, will the a stress in the y direction affect the measurement?
The strain gauge is constructed to try to minimize any Poisson effects. There will be some included in that direction, but the amount is usually pretty small. Usually one uses a rosette in the location of interest to get 3 directions of data and the Poisson effects, as well as other loadings are accounted for.
 
FredGarvin said:
I have heard that they tend to be larger because the change in capacitance under load is pretty small, so the need to have a large enough deflection in the diaphragm to get a signal that doesn't get lost in the system noise.

I see. Do they measure the dynamic pressure only or can they be modified to sense static pressure too? I am guessing they measure only dynamic pressure.
 
Why would you think they couldn't do both? There's nothing easier than measuring static pressure.
 
Well, I read on a site that since the change in capacitance produces a current only for a short amount of time, the capacitor can only measure dynamic pressure. Or is there a way around this?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
11K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K