Does the entropy of a closed system always increase

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the question of whether the entropy of a closed system always increases, exploring the implications of the second law of thermodynamics and the role of statistical mechanics. Participants examine scenarios where entropy might decrease and the conditions under which these scenarios could occur.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that while the standard interpretation of the second law of thermodynamics states that entropy will increase, it is theoretically possible for entropy to decrease under certain conditions, albeit with very low probability.
  • One participant suggests that reducing the size of a closed system can increase the likelihood of observing a decrease in entropy, using the example of a billiards game to illustrate this point.
  • Another participant challenges the idea of gravity organizing a system, arguing that such a scenario implies a non-equilibrium state, which may not fulfill the conditions of the second law of thermodynamics.
  • It is noted that the second law of thermodynamics is often interpreted as stating that entropy tends to increase rather than will always increase, emphasizing the statistical nature of the law.
  • One participant asserts that gravity does not combat entropy, highlighting the gravitational potential energy lost as objects fall towards mass.
  • A participant claims that the first argument presented is strong and likens it to a logical proof of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.
  • Another participant discusses the relationship between thermodynamics and statistical mechanics, noting that the second law assumes a sufficiently large sample size to disregard statistically insignificant variations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the conditions under which entropy can decrease, with some supporting the possibility while others argue against it. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives on the interpretation of the second law of thermodynamics.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of sample size in statistical mechanics and the implications for the application of the second law of thermodynamics, suggesting that smaller systems may behave differently than larger ones.

Jeebus
Messages
257
Reaction score
0
Question: Does the entropy of a closed system always increase, or could it possibly decrease?

Answer: The standard answer to your question from the laws of thermodynamics is that entropy (disorder) will increase, but there are at least two ways I believe entropy can decrease in a closed system.


First, you used the word 'possibly'. The laws of probability allow a closed system's entropy to decrease, but with such a low likelihood that the odds would make it very unlikely. Making the system small enough, however, by decreasing the number of its possible states can help improve the odds.


Take, for example, a movie of a billiards game 'break' shot. The ordered arrangement of balls becomes disordered, but running the film in reverse would show each individual collision obeying the usual physical laws. The time reversal would be apparent, however, when all the balls ended up in an ordered collection. Although that result could conceivably occur by chance, it is very unlikely. Reducing the example to just two balls would make the odds of an orderly arrangement occurring more likely.


For a second example of decreasing entropy, start with a closed system large enough to allow significant gravitational forces among its components. Gravity provides a 'negative energy' that can take a completely disordered system and organize it into a radically symmetric arrangement around a common center of gravity.



Follow-up Question to above Answer: Regarding the above example of the 2nd law and gravity "organizing" the balls...In that case, wouldn't the balls be in a non-equilibrium state to begin with, since it allows for seemingly automatic movement of the balls? That would mean that not all the conditions for 2LOT have been fulfilled and it would not be a great surprise to see some end-state of organization, right?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
You are right staiscally it is possible in any closed system for entropy to increase, indeed on very small scales, over short time periods this has been observed. Note the second law really should say 'tend' to increase rather than 'will' increase' at is a staistcal process.

Gravity is no way to combat entropy, your forgetting the GPE lost by objects as the fall towards mass.
 
So first one is right, second is wrong. But hey, that first one was pretty darn good - its essentially a logical proof of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.
 
Thermodynamics is a subset of the field Statistical Mechanics. It is implicit in the field that sample sizes will be sufficiently large to essentially disregard that which is statistically insignificant. By applying the 2nd law of thermodynamics, a large enough sample size is assumed to make it true. Otherwise, you really have a "many-body" problem, in which you must solve for each individual body's state.

Njorl
 
Originally posted by Njorl
Thermodynamics is a subset of the field Statistical Mechanics. It is implicit in the field that sample sizes will be sufficiently large to essentially disregard that which is statistically insignificant. By applying the 2nd law of thermodynamics, a large enough sample size is assumed to make it true. Otherwise, you really have a "many-body" problem, in which you must solve for each individual body's state.

Njorl


Ok. Thanks for the insight.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K