Does the self-diffusion of H2O18 differ from HDO in groundwater?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the self-diffusion coefficients of isotopes of water, specifically H2O18 and HDO, in groundwater. Participants explore the implications of these coefficients for understanding diffusion behavior in different contexts, including potential comparisons with other isotopes like D2O.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether H2O18 would diffuse faster than HDO, referencing standard diffusion coefficients from earlier studies.
  • Another participant suggests that H2O18, being heavier than HDO, might diffuse more slowly, but acknowledges the complexity introduced by deuterium exchange.
  • A third participant discusses the role of autoionization and solvation in diffusion, proposing that lighter species may not necessarily diffuse faster due to solvation effects, which complicate the comparison between HDO and H2O18.
  • A fourth participant introduces a related topic about the self-diffusion coefficients in ethanol-water mixtures, noting how concentration affects diffusion but does not directly address the original question about H2O18 and HDO.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the diffusion behavior of H2O18 compared to HDO, with no consensus reached on which isotope diffuses faster. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of solvation and ionization on diffusion rates.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about solvation and the specific conditions under which diffusion coefficients are measured. The complexity of interactions in aqueous solutions is acknowledged but not fully resolved.

jean
[SOLVED] self diffusion of water

Hi, I was wondering if anyone could give me a hand- or point in the right direction about a question I have concerning the self diffusion coefficients of HDO vs H2O18. To calculate the effective diffusion coefficients of isotopes of water in groundwater most people use the self-diffusion coefficients in Wang, Robinson and Edelman 1952 in which H2O18>HDO and HTO. I've found more recent references but they compare the diffusion coefficients of D2O and H2O18- I can't seem to find any mention of HDO. So, I guess my questions is; would you expect H2O18 to diffuse faster than HDO?
Thanks!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Hmm, that;s a good question. H2O18 is heavier than HDO, so in that aspect I would expect to to diffuse more slowly. Furthermore, you can get deuterium exchange, which is quite fast, and one could think it would move faster than the oxygen in the original HDO. I really don't know.
 
Intuitively, one bets the month's rent & grocery money on HDO or D2O --- and winds up living under a bridge hungry. What's going on? Autoionization allows O and H/D/T species to diffuse almost independently of each other in water --- "but, that means the lighter species are moving more slowly?" Nope --- cationic species in aqueous solution are very heavily solvated --- if one wishes to apply the various models to calculate/predict diffusion coefficients for H+ (or D, or T) it is necessary to include a solvation mass, which is going to be somewhere between four and six waters, if memory serves --- much heavier than the wandering O18H-, which is essentially unsolvated (charge delocalization leaves no real attractive center for solvation).

Had you simply asked which is faster without explaining what perplexed you, I woulda said HDO --- having to think about what let's O18 move faster, I can explain it --- perhaps not correctly, but, methinks this is what you're seeing --- probably more a matter of retardation of H, D, T for whatever fraction of time they spend in the ionized state than anything else.
 


The self-diffusion coefficient of water has a large drop as the concentration of ethanol increases from 0 to 0.3 and then it nearly keeps constant,while that of ethanol has a minimum around ethanol mole fraction of 0.5.The mutual diffusion coefficient could be divided into two parts,the kinematic factor and the thermodynamic factor.Both the kinematic and thermodynamic factors for ethanol-water mixtures were calculated.It was found that both the numbers of H bonds per water and per ethanol decrease as the mole fraction of ethanol increases. The composition dependences and the relationships between the self-and the mutual diffusion coefficients were further discussed.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K