Centripetal Acceleration calculation help

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The calculation of centripetal acceleration at the tip of a 4.00 m helicopter blade rotating at 300 rpm results in an acceleration of 3948.87 m/s². The linear speed of the blade tip is calculated to be 125.28 m/s, which is slower than the speed of sound at 340 m/s. The discussion confirms the accuracy of these calculations and highlights that helicopter blades do not exceed supersonic speeds due to physical limitations such as turbulence and friction. Historical context is provided, noting that helicopters have been operational since the 1920s without achieving supersonic blade speeds.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of centripetal acceleration formula: Ac = rw²
  • Familiarity with angular velocity conversion from rpm to rad/s
  • Basic knowledge of linear speed calculation: v = rw
  • Awareness of sound speed in air (340 m/s)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the effects of turbulence and friction on rotor blade performance in helicopters.
  • Research the historical development of helicopter technology since the 1920s.
  • Learn about the limitations of propeller-driven aircraft regarding supersonic speeds.
  • Explore advanced topics in fluid dynamics related to rotorcraft design.
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, physics students, and aviation enthusiasts interested in helicopter dynamics and performance calculations.

nautica
a) calculate the centipetal acc at the tip of a 4.00 m long helicopter blade that rotates at 300 rpm.

300 rpm = 31.42 rad/s = w

Centrip Acc = rw^2

Ac = (3.41 rad/s)^2 * 4 m

Ac = 3948.87 m/s^2

b)compare linear speed of the tip with the speed of sound which is 340 m/s

v=rw

v = 4m * (31.42 rad/sec) = 125.28 m/s

So the blades are slower than the speed of sound.

This does not sound right to me I figured the blades would be faster - but maybe just not at the tip?

Thanks
Nautica
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OK up to here, I think...
Originally posted by nautica
Ac = 3948.87 m/s^2
But how do you arrive at this figure? - Seems much too large to me...
v=rw
v = 4m * (31.42 rad/sec) = 125.28 m/s
So the blades are slower than the speed of sound.
This does not sound right to me I figured the blades would be faster - but maybe just not at the tip?
IMO, your math is correct here. Not sure, but I think helicopters have been around since the 1920's or so, when no aircraft engineer was even close to handling supersonic speeds... Still those machines worked, didn't they? Another thing, I believe it's not possible to move supersonic with any propeller-driven aircraft because the blades are just not allowed to move supersonic - turbulence & friction would lead to destruction... Just compare a helicopter's sound to that of a whiplash (where the tip does reach supersonic) - it's very different, much smoother isn't it? ... Enough for now.
 
Sorry, it was a typo, should have been 31.42

Thanks
Nautica
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K