Solving Integral of ln(2x+1)dx with By Parts Method

  • Thread starter Thread starter mugzieee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the integral of ln(2x+1) with respect to x, specifically using the integration by parts method. Participants are exploring different approaches to solve this integral.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts integration by parts but encounters difficulties, particularly with the resulting integrals. Some participants suggest making a substitution instead, specifically letting u = 2x + 1, which simplifies the integral.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing various methods to approach the integral. While some guidance has been offered regarding substitution, there is no explicit consensus on the best method yet.

Contextual Notes

The original poster is required to use integration by parts, which may be influencing their approach despite suggestions for substitution. There may also be confusion regarding the application of the integration by parts formula.

mugzieee
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
Hey guys i keep getting stuck with this:
integral of ( ln(2x+1)dx)
im supposed to use by parts
heres what i have done
u=ln(2x+1)
du=2/2x+1
dv=dx
v=x

then i apply the formula uv-vdu
and i end up with another integral I am supposed to use by parts for:
integral of(2x/2x+1 dx)
heres what i have done for that integral
u=2x
.5du=dx
dv=1/2x+1
v=ln(2x+1)

then i apply the formula again, and since i have the same integal i stared wit, i add it to the lef side etc etc... but i don't get the correct answer...what does it look lie I am doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Make a substitution first.

[tex]2x+1 = u[/tex]

And then you'd have to integrate something proportional to [itex]\int \ln u \ du[/itex] which is really easy.

Daniel.
 
Math is easy once you accept the fact that substitution is the way to go ;)
 
so make the u=2x+1 substitution in the first step of the problm?
 
Yes as dexter noted

[tex]\int \ln (2x+1) dx[/tex]

[tex]u = 2x +1[/tex]

[tex]du = 2dx[/tex]

[tex]\int \ln (u) \frac{du}{2}[/tex]
 
gotcha, thanx.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K