.Solving the Exact Equation P(x)y"+Q(x)y'+R(x)y=0

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter physicsss
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the exactness of the differential equation P(x)y'' + Q(x)y' + R(x)y = 0, exploring conditions for exactness, methods for solving such equations, and finding integrating factors. Participants engage in technical reasoning and mathematical derivations related to this topic.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the equation is exact if it can be expressed in the form (P(x)y')' + (f(x)y)' = 0, leading to a necessary condition for exactness: P''(x) - Q'(x) + R(x) = 0.
  • Others discuss the process of equating coefficients from the derived forms of the equation to generate necessary conditions, emphasizing the need to eliminate functions M and N.
  • A participant questions how to find an integrating factor for the specific differential equation y'' + xy' + y = 0, expressing uncertainty after reaching a first-order form.
  • Another participant suggests that Q may equal the derivative of M (which is P) plus the antiderivative of N', which is R, and seeks clarification on this interpretation.
  • One participant shares a detailed approach to solving a specific equation using the method of exact equations, including steps for finding constants and integrating factors.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of initial conditions on the solutions of the differential equations, with examples provided to illustrate the process.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various interpretations and methods regarding the exactness of the differential equation and the process of finding integrating factors. There is no clear consensus on the best approach or the correctness of certain interpretations, indicating multiple competing views remain.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the importance of initial conditions in determining constants in the solutions, while others highlight the need for careful consideration of the relationships between the functions involved in the equations.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in differential equations, particularly those studying exact equations and integrating factors, may find this discussion beneficial. It may also appeal to those working on related homework problems or seeking clarification on mathematical techniques in this area.

physicsss
Messages
319
Reaction score
0
The equation P(x)y"+Q(x)y'+R(x)y=0 is said to be exact if it can be written in the form [P(x)y']'+[f(x)y]'=0, where f(x) is to be determined in terms of P(x), Q(x), and R(x). The latter equation can be integrated once immediately, resultingin a first order linear equation for y that can be solved. By equating the coefficients of the preceding equations and then eliminating f(x), show that a necessary condition for exactness is P"(x)-Q'(x)+R(x)=0.

I don't understand how to equate the coefficients and I was stuck after taking the integral of [P(x)y']'+[f(x)y]'=0 and got [P(x)y']+[f(x)y]=0
 
Physics news on Phys.org
all right, let's start with the basics:
1. Py'' + Qy' + Ry = 0

is said to be exact if it can be written in the form
2. (My')' + (Ny)' = 0

Where P, Q, R, M, N, are functions only of x.
prime is derivative wrt x. and we have existence
of M'', P'', N', Q'. and until I know better assume
none of the above is 0.

if we take the derivatives indicated in 2.
M'y' + My'' + N'y + Ny' = 0
or

My'' + (M' + N)y' + N'y = 0.
Py'' + Qy' + Ry = 0

now try equating the coefficients and generating
the necessary condition. [in this case, you need
to eliminate both M, and N.]


to solve (My')' +(Ny)' = 0
we integrate once to get My' + Ny = C
where C is an integration constant

we can put this in standard form
y' + (N/M)y = C/M

this is solvable by picking a suitable integrating factor...

[now, which conditions on P, Q, R, N, M were necessary?]
 
Last edited:
So [P(x)y']'+[f(x)y]'=0 -> P(x)y"+(P'(x)+f(x))y'+f '(x)y=0, and equating them I got:
P(x)=P(x),
Q(x)=P'(x)+f(x) -> f '(x)= -P"(x)+Q'(x)
R(x)= f '(x)

Then setting -P"(x)+Q'(x) = R(x) -> P"(x)-Q'(x)+R(x)=0

Will that suffice for showing the condition?
 
Last edited:
Another question: how do I find an integrating factor for the Diff. Eq y"+xy'+y=0?

I got it into this form: (y')'+(xy)'=0, integrated and got y'+(xy)=C. And I don't know where to go from here to find C.
 
qbert said:
My'' + (M' + N)y' + N'y = 0.
Py'' + Qy' + Ry = 0

Thanks Qbert. That's very interesting. Can I offer some help and kindly correct me if I'm wrong because this is new to me too.

Physicsss, look carefully at those two equations Qbert gave us. Very carefully. Isn't P=M, R is something, but look at the middle part:

Isn't Q equal to the derivative of M (which is P) plus the antiderivative of N' which is R? You know, if R is equal to N' then N is equal to the antiderivative of R. So one can look at an equation:

[tex]Py^{''}+Qy^{'}+Ry=0[/tex]

and ask immediately: is the center function equal to the derivative of the first function plus the antiderivative of the third function? Is this correct Qbert?

Now, how about solving this equation which I'm working on too using this method:

[tex]x^2 y^{''}+(2x+\frac{1}{4} x^4)y^{'}+x^3y=0[/tex]

Any initial condtions, say y(0.1)=0 and y'(0.1)=1 (stay away from singularity at x=0) or whatever initial conditions are easy.

Edit: I mean you Physicsss, not you Qbert.
 
Last edited:
physicsss said:
Another question: how do I find an integrating factor for the Diff. Eq y"+xy'+y=0?

I got it into this form: (y')'+(xy)'=0, integrated and got y'+(xy)=C. And I don't know where to go from here to find C.

Unless you have some additional conditions you can't- C is a "constant of integration". If you solve the first order equation y'+ xy= C, then you get another constant. That's what you would expect- when you solve a second order differential equation, you expect the general solution to involve two undetermined constants.

If the problem were y"+ xy'+ y= 0 with initial conditions: y(0)= 1, y'(0)= 0, then, taking x= 0 in y'+ xy= C, we get 0+ 0(1)= C or C= 0. That makes the equation y'+ xy= 0 which is easy (I cleverly chose y'(0)= 0 to get that!).
dy= -xy dx or dy/y= -xd so ln|y|= -x2+ D (D is the new constant of integration). We can write that as y= E exp(-x2 (E= exp(D)).
At x= 0 that becomes y= 1= E e0= E so E= 1 and the solution to this intial value problem is y(x)= exp(-x2).
 
Physicsss, where you at? Try and follow this one and then I have one for you to try if you want. The technique Qbert suggested is new to me so this is my first attempt at using such and applying it to an IVP:

For the equation:

[tex]Py^{''}+Qy^{'}+Ry=0[/tex]

If it's exact we can immediately write:

[tex](Py^{'})^{'}+(y\int R)^{'}=0[/tex]

Example:

[tex]x^2y^{''}+(2x+\frac{1}{4}x^4)y^{'}+x^3y=0;\quad y(0.1)=0,\quad y^{'}(0.1)=1[/tex]

Noting that the middle function is the sum of the derivative of the first function and the antiderivative of the last function, we can then say:

[tex](x^2y^{'})^{'}+(\frac{1}{4}x^4y)^{'}=0[/tex]

Taking antiderivatives:

[tex]\int (x^2y^{'})^{'}+\int(\frac{1}{4}x^4y)^{'}=\int 0[/tex]

Yielding:

[tex]x^2y^{'}+1/4x^4y=c_1[/tex]

Setting up this equation in the standard form to determine the integrating factor, we divide by [itex]x^2[/itex]

[tex]y^{'}+1/4x^2y=c_1x^{-2}[/tex]

The integrating factor is:

[tex]\sigma=Exp\left(\int 1/4 x^2dx\right)=e^{x^3/12}[/tex]

Multiplying the ODE by [itex]\sigma[/itex] converts the LHS to an exact differential:

[tex]d(e^{x^3/12}y)=c_1x^{-2}e^{x^3/12}[/tex]

Integrating:

[tex]\int_{\xi=0.1,\zeta=0}^{\xi=x,\zeta=y} d(e^{\xi^3/12}\zeta)=c_1\int_{0.1}^{x}t^{-2}e^{t^3/12}dt[/tex]

This yields:

[tex]e^{x^3/12}y(x)=c_1\int_{0.1}^x t^{-2}e^{t^3/12}dt[/tex]

or:

[tex]y(x)=c_1e^{-x^3/12}\int_{0.1}^x t^{-2}e^{t^3/12}dt[/tex]

So how do we find the constant? What about differentiating y(x) using Leibnitz's rule for the integral:

[tex]y^{'}(x)=c_1\left[e^{-x^3/12}\frac{d}{dx}\left(\int_{0.1}^x t^{-2}e^{t^3/12}dt\right)+\left(\int_{0.1}^x t^{-2}e^{t^3/12}dt\right)\frac{d}{dx}e^{-x^3/12}\right][/tex]

I know it's messy but try to follow it alright?

Now, we know from the IVP that the derivative at 0.1 is 1. Now look at the second sum. When we insert x=0.1 into the integral, that will be zero right? We're left with then:

[tex]y^{'}(x)=c_1e^{-x^3/12}\left(x^{-2}e^{x^3/12}\right)=\frac{c_1}{x^2}[/tex]

Solving:

[tex]y^{'}(0.1)=\frac{c_1}{(0.1)^2}=1[/tex]

We have [itex]c_1=0.01[/itex]

Thus the solution is:

[tex]y(x)=0.01e^{-x^3/12}\int_{0.1}^x t^{-2}e^{t^3/12}dt[/tex]

Now, there's nothing wrong with leaving it that way. Perfectly fine. You're comfortable with functions like Sin(x), Tan(x) right? What about a Sal(x)?

Let:

[tex]Sal(x)=\int_{0.1}^x t^{-2}e^{t^3/12}dt[/tex]

Then the solution is simply:

[tex]y(x)=0.01e^{-x^3/12}Sal(x)[/tex]

No different than using Sin(x) ok?

A plot is attached.

Now try this one:

[tex]6y^{''}+(\cos x) y^{'}-(\sin x) y=0; \quad y(0)=0,\quad y^{'}(0)=1[/tex]

I have no idea how it will turn out. :smile:
 

Attachments

  • y in terms of sal(x).JPG
    y in terms of sal(x).JPG
    3.2 KB · Views: 579
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K