Quantum coherence in a gas sample

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the Pascal principle in a U-tube setup with unequal cross-sectional areas, specifically 2 square meters on one side and 10 square meters on the other. The tube is designed to be completely reflective and contains a thermal radiation field at temperature T, with light pressure effects considered. Participants, including @DaTario and Greg, express curiosity about the implications of light pressure on the validity of the Pascal principle in this unique context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Pascal principle in fluid mechanics
  • Knowledge of light pressure and its effects on surfaces
  • Familiarity with thermal radiation concepts
  • Basic principles of quantum mechanics related to coherence
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of light pressure on fluid dynamics
  • Explore the relationship between thermal radiation and quantum coherence
  • Study the effects of reflective surfaces on radiation pressure
  • Investigate experimental setups for testing Pascal's principle in non-standard conditions
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, engineers, and researchers interested in fluid dynamics, quantum mechanics, and the interaction of light with matter will benefit from this discussion.

DaTario
Messages
1,097
Reaction score
46
Pascal principle with light pressure

Hello,

Supose you have an U tube, in which the inner walls are made absolutelly reflective. Now, put a termical state (temperature T) for the radiation field inside the tube and close it with reflective discs which can slide without friction. Supose further that de diameter of the tube in its terminations are not equal. For the sake of definiteness, let's assume 2 sq meters cross section in one side and 10 sq meters in the other. My question is: Taking into account light pressure effects , is the Pascal principle valid in this context ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Greg, no, but I still have some excitation about it. Do you have any info or comment?

Editing: only reading again I noticed that the title has some mistake in it. In my question, the tube should have inside only vacuum and light. Interesting to note.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K