Uncertainty Relations and Functions of Operators

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dathascome
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qm
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around quantum mechanics, specifically focusing on uncertainty relations and functions of operators. Participants are exploring the derivation of uncertainty relations involving hermitian operators and the implications of non-commuting operators in the context of exponential functions of operators.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the equality of commutators in the context of uncertainty relations and expresses confusion over the derivation presented in their textbook. They also question the reasoning behind the non-equality of the product of exponentials of operators and seek clarification on how to demonstrate this using Taylor expansions.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problems, with some providing insights and attempting to clarify the original poster's misunderstandings. There is an ongoing exploration of the mathematical relationships involved, particularly regarding commutators and Taylor series expansions, but no consensus has been reached on the specific questions raised.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of homework assignments, which may limit the information they can share or the depth of their explanations. The discussion includes assumptions about the properties of operators and their commutation relations that are being questioned.

Dathascome
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
More QM trouble:(

Hi there,
I'm having a bit of trouble with something dealing with functions of operators and commutators. It's two different examples actually. For the first one I have that A and B are hermitian operators and their expected values with respect to a normalized state vector /S> are <A>=<S/A\S>
where [tex] \Delta [/tex]A=sqrt(A-<A>), and similarly for B.
Now here's the thing I'm having trouble with. They're trying to derive the uncertainty relation in this book, and for part of it they say that [[tex] \Delta [/tex]A,[tex] \Delta [/tex]B]=[A,B]
(these are the commutators)
I know it's probably something really obvious but for some reason I don't see it. I tried actually writing out the full expression for the commutator but I don't see why they would be equal.

As for the second problem I'm having, it has to do with functions of operators. Again I have 2 operators (this time not necessarily hermitian) that do not commute, [A,B] not equal to 0, which implies that [B,F(A)] (some function of A) is also not equal to 0. So here comes the parts I'm not sure of, they say that e^A*e^Bnot equal to e^(A+B), which I don't see why. How could I show this using a taylor expansion. I tried but didn't really get what I should have.
They then proceed to say that e^A*e^b = e^(A+B)*e^[A,B]/2

and also,
e^A*B*e^-A= B+ [A,B] + 1/2![A,[A,B]]+ 1/3![A,[A,[A,B]]]+...

neither of which I fully understand...I mean, I can see that the last one is a taylor series but I don't fully understand either of the last two things.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Forgive me for not noticing that thread. Suprisingly that is the problem I was looking at. The thing is it didn't really answer my question. I'm sorry I know that there's probably something really stupid that I'm missing but I don't see this
the commutator
[tex][\Delta A,~ \Delta B] = [A - \langle A \rangle I,~B - \langle B \rangle I] = [A,B] ~~~-~(4)[/tex]
I do not get for some reason.
Writing out the commutator
[tex] AB-A\langle B \rangle I - \langle A \rangle I B + \langle A \rangle I \langle B \rangle I -BA + B\langle A\rangle I +\langle B \rangle I A- \langle B \rangle I \langle A \rangle I[/tex]

So I can pick out the AB-BA=[A,B], but what happens to all the rest of that stuff there?
OlderDan, thanks for trying to point me in the right direction, any further help would be great.
 
Last edited:
Dathascome said:
Writing out the commutator
[tex] AB-A\langle B \rangle I - \langle A \rangle I B + \langle A \rangle I \langle B \rangle I -BA + B\langle A\rangle I +\langle B \rangle I A- \langle B \rangle I \langle A \rangle I[/tex]

So I can pick out the AB-BA=[A,B], but what happens to all the rest of that stuff there?
Notice that [itex]\langle X \rangle[/itex] is just a scalar and [itex]IX = XI = X[/itex], so all the other terms cancel off nicely.
 
Last edited:
Damnit, I knew it was something really simple. Those are things that always get me, the obvious or somewhat obvious things :cry:

Is it something just as obvious that I missed concerning my second question with the exponentials?
 
Dathascome said:
So here comes the parts I'm not sure of, they say that e^A*e^Bnot equal to e^(A+B), which I don't see why. How could I show this using a taylor expansion. I tried but didn't really get what I should have.
They then proceed to say that e^A*e^b = e^(A+B)*e^[A,B]/2

and also,
e^A*B*e^-A= B+ [A,B] + 1/2![A,[A,B]]+ 1/3![A,[A,[A,B]]]+...

neither of which I fully understand...I mean, I can see that the last one is a taylor series but I don't fully understand either of the last two things.

First, Taylor expand the exponentials :

[tex]a^A \cdot e^B = (I + A + \frac {A^2}{2!} + \frac {A^3}{3!} + ...)(I + B + \frac {B^2}{2!} + \frac {B^3}{3!} + ...)[/tex]
[tex]=I + A + B + AB + \frac {A^2 + B^2}{2!} + ...<br /> = I + (A+B) + \frac {A^2 + B^2 + 2AB}{2!} + ...[/tex]

But notice that, for instance
[tex](A+B)^2 = A^2 + B^2+AB+BA = A^2 + B^2+2AB+BA-AB=(A+B)^2+[B,A] \neq (A+B)^2[/tex]

Use this above and hopefully, the result will follow. :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K