Simple Diffraction: Deriving Equations with Phasors

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Manchot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diffraction
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving equations related to single-slit Fraunhofer diffraction using phasors. Participants are examining the derivation process and addressing potential errors in the integration steps involved in the calculation.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes a discrepancy between their phasor-derived result and the lecture notes, specifically regarding a factor of the slit width 'a' in the denominator.
  • Another participant questions where the mistake might lie in the derivation process.
  • A third participant suggests that the factor of 'a' was incorrectly introduced in the denominator.
  • A later reply indicates that the correct form of the integral should involve integrating with respect to 'x' rather than 'x-prime', which may lead to the correct result being the sinc function.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correctness of the integration steps and the presence of the factor of 'a'. There is no consensus on the resolution of the discrepancies noted in the derivations.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the integration variable and the assumptions made in the derivation process. The discussion highlights potential errors in the application of Fourier integrals.

Manchot
Messages
470
Reaction score
5
Hello, I've recently been studying simple diffraction for an upcoming proficiency test, and in the lecture notes for the class, a simple equation regarding single-slit Fraunhoffer diffraction was derived. The derivation was a little weird, so as an exercise, I just decided to go ahead and use phasors to derive the formula myself. Anyway, when I was finished, I nearly had the exact same result as the notes, except for one thing: a factor of a, the width of the slit. Because I couldn't find my mistake anywhere, I decided to look up the result on Wikipedia, which I suspected would do it the same way that I did. Anyway, in the step where the factor of a in the denominator was introduced, there seems to be an integration error. Am I just missing something here?

[tex]= C \int_{-\frac{a}{2}}^{\frac{a}{2}}e^\frac{ikxx^\prime}{z} \,dx^\prime<br /> =C \frac{\left(e^\frac{ikax}{2z} - e^\frac{-ikax}{2z}\right)}{\frac{2ikax}{2z}}[/tex]
 
Science news on Phys.org
where do you think there is a mistake ?

marlon
 
Looks to me like they snuck in that factor of a in the denominator where it doesn't belong.
 
you are right Doc Al

i did not even see that...i must be getting delirious again

marlon
 
In my notes, the LHS should be;

[tex]C \int_{-\frac{a}{2}}^{\frac{a}{2}}e^{ikxsin\theta} dx[/tex]

Which is just a Fourier integral ([itex]u = xsin\theta[/itex] is the conjugate variable), whereby the correct result is the sinc function given.

It would appear that you should be integrating with respect to x rather than x-prime.

Claude.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K