asdf1
- 734
- 0
Why doesn't an irreversible adiabatic process follow the equation,
PV^(gamma)=constant?
PV^(gamma)=constant?
The discussion revolves around the applicability of the equation PV^(gamma)=constant to irreversible adiabatic processes. Participants explore the conditions under which this equation holds true and the implications of irreversible processes in thermodynamics.
Participants do not reach a consensus, as there are multiple competing views regarding the nature of irreversible adiabatic processes and their adherence to the equation PV^(gamma)=constant.
Limitations include the dependence on definitions of adiabatic processes and the assumptions regarding thermodynamic equilibrium and kinetic energy transfer.
asdf1 said:Why doesn't an irreversible adiabatic process follow the equation,
PV^(gamma)=constant?
For [itex]PV^\gamma = constant[/itex] to apply, the ideal gas law must apply at all times during the process. But this assumes that the system is at perfect thermodynamic equilibrium at all times during the process.Clausius2 said:Although some people here (i.e. my friend Andrew Mason) are of another "school of knowledge", I must say an irreversible adiabatic process is not an isentropic one, and so it is not described by your equation.