What is the term CHO in food science?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the abbreviation "CHO" as it appears in a food science lecture on carbohydrates. Participants explore its meaning, usage, and potential reasons for its inclusion in the lecture slides without prior explanation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant identifies CHO as the abbreviation for carbohydrate.
  • Another participant questions the lecturer's choice to use the abbreviation without prior introduction, noting that the full term was used elsewhere in the presentation.
  • Some participants suggest that the abbreviation may have been used due to space constraints on the slides or possibly borrowed from another source.
  • A participant speculates about a connection between the chemical symbols for carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen and the abbreviation CHO.
  • There is a discussion about the general formula for carbohydrates, with one participant noting the ratio of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen in monosaccharides and disaccharides, while expressing curiosity about polysaccharides.
  • Some participants reiterate the elemental composition of carbohydrates as carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that CHO stands for carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen, but there is no consensus on why the abbreviation was used in the lecture. Multiple competing views regarding the lecturer's intent and the abbreviation's usage remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the specific reasons for the lecturer's choice of abbreviation, including potential habits, slide constraints, or borrowed content. The discussion also highlights the complexity of carbohydrate structures and their variations.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students studying food science, particularly those interested in the terminology and chemical composition of carbohydrates.

pivoxa15
Messages
2,250
Reaction score
1
I was reviewing a basic food science lecture slide and came across the term CHO in the middle of it on slide 26-28. But there is no explanation of what it is (what it stands for). The lecture was a basic introduction on carbohydrates. Anybody know?

The information on the slides are below:

26. In animals
CHOs serve as the major source of energy. Some CHO can be readily digested and utilized by animals while other CHOs cannot be digested by the mammalian system.

27. CHOs not used immediately for energy will be converted to and stored as fat. Animals that consume food of animal origin will receive a higher amount of energy from fat as compared to those receive nearly all their energy from CHOs.

28. Fiber fractions
Fiber fractions of the CHO which are not digested by the mammalian system serve the important role of providing mass to void from the gastrointestinal tract. In humans there seems to be added protection from atherosclerosis and reduction in colon cancer with higher dietary fiber.


Thanks
 
Biology news on Phys.org
CHO is the abbreviation for carbohydrate
 
iansmith, I thought it might be from the descriptions but how strange that the lecturer having never used the term, put them on three slides and then never use it again. He used the full word carbohydrate on all the other slides.
 
Some prof used abbreviation on certain slides because it is too "crowed" and they want to add more info.

Or he "borrowed" part of the presentation from somebody else.
 
Hmmm, could there may be a connection between the chemical symbol for elements found in carbohydrates and the choice of this abbreviation? :rolleyes:
 
:biggrin: Yes, I'm pretty such there is--!

I mean, who refers to carbohydrates as "Cbhdts"??
 
pivoxa15 said:
iansmith, I thought it might be from the descriptions but how strange that the lecturer having never used the term, put them on three slides and then never use it again. He used the full word carbohydrate on all the other slides.

There could be a number of reasons, such as he borrowed the slides from another lecture or lecturer, just couldn't fit the whole word in on the slide, originally wrote all the slides with the abbreviation due to habit and missed a few when he went back to change them. Were they near the end of the lecture? Perhaps they were after he explained carbohydrate structure and had explained enough to introduce the abbreviation? He could have also just added those slides after realizing there was a gap in the material and was tired by then, so forgot to write out the full word for the class.

Anyway, this is why it's important to pay attention in lecture :smile:, because I'm sure he still said the full word when talking about these slides (nobody says "C-H-O", they just write it that way), at which time, if this was a new abbreviation to you, you could have noted the definition.
 
A carbohydrate is generally CxH2xOx, meaning there are twice as many hydrogens as oxygens and carbons.
 
Careful newbie.. you going toes to toes with the big bear here :smile:
 
  • #10
phosphorylated said:
A carbohydrate is generally CxH2xOx, meaning there are twice as many hydrogens as oxygens and carbons.
I suppose that holds roughly true in the monosaccharides and disaccharides that I know of (in the disaccharides I am learning about, ex. lactose, maltose, and sucrose, the dehydration reaction between their monomers causes them to lose (the equivalent of) a molecule of H2O, so C6H12O6 + C6H12O6 - H2O ends up as C12H22O11).
But for the polysaccharides, I don't know anything about the CHO ratio. I'm curious to know, though, since I am just beginning to learn this stuff!
 
Last edited:
  • #11
It means (as stated):
Carbon
Hydrogen
Oxygen
 
  • #12
somasimple said:
It means (as stated):
Carbon
Hydrogen
Oxygen
Ouabache said:
Hmmm, could there may be a connection between the chemical symbol for elements found in carbohydrates and the choice of this abbreviation? :rolleyes:
Good to see someone thought my query through... :wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
132
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
7K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
10K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
7K