Understanding Friction: The Impact of Weight on Surface Resistance

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mom
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around an experiment investigating the relationship between weight and friction, specifically how different configurations of blocks affect the resistance encountered when sliding across various surfaces. The focus is on understanding the observed differences in frictional force when using two blocks stacked versus two blocks connected in a line.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Experimental/applied
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • A participant describes an experiment measuring the length of a rubber band when pulled across different surfaces, noting that the frictional force appears to increase with the number of blocks used.
  • Another participant questions the relevance of surface area, citing literature that states friction force is independent of surface area.
  • A participant reports specific force measurements for the two configurations, indicating a higher force required when the blocks are stacked compared to when they are connected in a line.
  • A participant suggests that the experiment may not be conducted on an incline, which could affect the results.
  • Another participant proposes that the relationship between weight and surface area contact may not be straightforward, suggesting that increasing weight while reducing surface area does not lead to a simple balance in frictional force.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the role of surface area in friction, with some asserting that it should not affect the frictional force while others present experimental evidence suggesting it does. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the impact of surface area and weight on friction.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the experiment's conditions, such as whether it is conducted on an incline, may influence the results. There are also indications that the assumptions about surface area and weight may not fully account for the observed outcomes.

mom
Hello, first time posting...
I am helping a 5th grade teacher out with a physics experiment involoving friction. The first run is a block of wood and measure the difference in the length of a rubber band when you pull it across a desk and then again along sandpaper. Every thing fine so far, results as expected with the rubber band longer with the sandpaper. Next attach a second block to the first by a piece of string (like a train) and do them again. Again, everything as expected (band longer with two blocks, longest on the sandpaper). Finally, we do the last run (two blocks on top of each other). We are not surprised to see that the rubber band is the longest when two blocks are used and even longer on the sandpaper. My question is why? I understand the force to overcome friction is dependent on weight but the weight is the same in the last two situations. Shouldn't they be the same? I know it is not supposed to be dependent on surface area but I am confused. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
surface area.

Nautica
 
Surface area? Is that your answer? The few books I've looked in say friction force is independent of surface area. I just can't explain why I am getting these results. We redid the last part again using a spring that measures force on the rubber band. We got 300Newtons for the two block train setup on sandpaper and 450N for the same two blocks on top of each other. The weight stays the same in both cases the only thing that changes is the surface area in contact with the sandpaper. Anyone have any ideas? I really need this explained today. Thanks!
 
This experiment isn't being done on an incline, is it?

- Warren
 
The reason why friction isn't supposed to change is that you are varying the surface area in contact and the weight per square inch of surface area.

If that change does not remain an equal trade, (if you add to either one without removing from the other), it will not balance out.

That is what is happening to you. You have doubled the weight, however you have only reduced the surface area by ALMOST half because the weight is pressing the sandpaper into the wood and has increased the surface area per square inch in contact with the sandpaper.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
13K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
49
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K