Can You Calculate the Trajectory of an Object Orbiting Earth at High Speed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chui
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Orbit
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the trajectory of an object orbiting Earth at high speed, specifically starting from a velocity of 12,000 meters per second at a distance of 40,000 kilometers from Earth's center. Participants explore the implications of mass and gravitational forces on the object's path.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the necessity of the object's mass in the calculations and the implications of treating it as a massless particle. There are suggestions to plot force vectors and analyze the object's motion over time. Some participants propose simulating the trajectory versus describing the orbit in terms of apogee and perigee. Others consider solving differential equations in polar coordinates and using conservation of energy.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active with various approaches being explored, including the use of differential equations and energy conservation. Participants are questioning the assumptions made about the object's mass and trajectory shape, indicating a productive exchange of ideas without a clear consensus on the best method.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the integration of equations and the interpretation of the trajectory, with some participants expressing uncertainty about the nature of the orbit (ellipse versus spiral). The discussion reflects the complexity of orbital mechanics and the assumptions involved in the calculations.

chui
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
An object starts at a velocity of 12,000meter/sec,
(the direction tangent to an orbit around earth)
from a distance of 40,000km from Earth's center.

How can I calculate its track?
thnks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't the object's mass necessary for this type of problem? I believe that at speeds like this, a "massless" point particle would escape Earth's gravity and travel in a path that is almost straight (but slightly curved due it its very small relativistic mass). The first thing you should do is plot the force vectors, and without mass this isn't possible.

The resultant vector will be sufficient to keep the object in orbit (at equilibrium), or it will signify an escape, or it will signify a descent towards earth. You'll need to plot its position as a function of time to plot its path. Make the center of the Earth the origin. Make the mass at (40, 0), and make the x-axis measured in kilometers. Initial vector heads in the +y direction. What's its magnitude? What's the magnitude of the force toward the origin? How does the position of the point change after 1 second, based on its acceleration towards the origin?
 
Do you want to *simulate* this path
(location as function of time, step-by-step)
Or do you want to describe the orbit*
(apogee radius and speed, perigee r & v)?

VPython does a nice job with the momentum vector,
step-by-step changing it according to F(r_vec)

Can you find its KE, total E, and angular momentum?
 
No, the object's mass is not necessary (assuming it does have mass!) since, as with all gravity problems, the m cancels in [itex]F= -\frac{GMm}{r^2}= ma[/itex].

One way to do this would be to solve the differential equations for the motion- preferably in polar coordinates but they are non-linear. A good book on oribital motion should have an example of this.

Probably better is to assume the orbit is an ellipse, write down the general equation of an ellipse (again, I would use polar coordinates) and use conservation of energy to determine the coefficients.
 
HallsofIvy said:
One way to do this would be to solve the differential equations for the motion- preferably in polar coordinates but they are non-linear.

ok, tell me if what I am doing here is fine becous I think it isnt:
for the R axis (Polar cordinatsr) it should be:
v^2/r - MG/r^2 = F(r)
now I can integrate this function (dr) from 40,000,000 to wherever I want the final distance from Earth to be. and get the acceleration on this axis.

for the angle Theta I can 360*v*t/2(pai)r
but then I don't what to do with the variable r.

HallsofIvy said:
Probably better is to assume the orbit is an ellipse

well, does it? (I thoght it will be some kind of an going-out Spirall)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K