Anticipated well-being over survival?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the potential replacement of the concept of survival in evolutionary theory with the idea of anticipated well-being. Participants examine whether this concept could apply to both primitive biota and more complex organisms, including the implications for altruism and cultural influences on gene propagation.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that anticipated well-being could encompass both self-aware survival and altruistic behaviors, questioning if primitive life forms possess a sense of well-being.
  • Others argue that the concept of well-being does not align well with survival, suggesting that the primary function of living organisms is to ensure the survival of their offspring.
  • A participant asserts that the success of gene propagation is independent of an organism's feelings, citing historical examples like Genghis Khan to illustrate that behavior driven by personal well-being does not necessarily correlate with genetic success.
  • One participant requests a mechanism explaining how the anticipation of well-being could enhance gene propagation probabilities.
  • Another viewpoint suggests that as evolution progresses, the focus may shift from mere survival to maximizing well-being, citing human longevity and the role of modern medicine in reproduction.
  • Some participants highlight the influence of cultural pressures on gene propagation, noting historical examples where individuals sought well-being at the expense of genetic contribution.
  • A theory is presented that non-reproductive individuals, such as gay people, may still contribute to community well-being and child-rearing, indicating that factors beyond genetics can influence heredity.
  • One participant emphasizes that constructs like anticipated well-being may play a significant role in shaping heredity, alongside genetic factors, suggesting a complex interplay between societal influences and biological inheritance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the relationship between survival, well-being, and gene propagation, with no consensus reached on whether anticipated well-being can effectively replace the concept of survival in evolutionary theory.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various assumptions about the definitions of well-being and survival, and the implications of cultural and social factors on evolutionary processes remain unresolved.

Loren Booda
Messages
3,115
Reaction score
4
Can one replace the concept of survival in the theory of evolution with one of anticipated well-being? This covers both progressive survival of the self-aware and unselfish processes like altruism. Would you support that even primitive biota have a sense of what might be interpreted as well-being?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
well being? truism? the two don't match well from what i see, i would secpect(though i don't know) that all living things ahve a basic function to keep their offspring alive, after all, if animals didn't look after their young in that sense, there would be no life... although, it is quite often that an animal kills it's own blood...

as for well-being, do you mean as in 'quality of life'?
 
Loren Booda said:
Can one replace the concept of survival in the theory of evolution with one of anticipated well-being? This covers both progressive survival of the self-aware and unselfish processes like altruism. Would you support that even primitive biota have a sense of what might be interpreted as well-being?

It doen't matter what the phenotype feels , only what percentage of its genes make it into future generations. Genghis Kahn's well being, as he expressed it, was in killing foes and stealing their women, and he was apparently the most successful propagator known to history.
 
Before I could accept such a theory, I would need an explanation of some mechanism by which the anticipation of well-being could result in the increased probability of a gene being porpogated.
 
Sex, by far the primary progenitor of offspring and genetic self promoter, is one of the most popularly sought sources of well being.
 
Last edited:
As evolution progresses and creatures become more complex, survival becomes superseded by the maximization of well-being. Human females live 30 years past their reproductive usefulness, but usually enjoy a productive longevity, sometimes caring for their descendents. Modern drugs and medical procedures allow generations of lovers with faulty chromosomes to reproduce.

(Anticipated well-being, as I use it, is the pursuit of a quality life with its choice of rewards often transcending genetics.)

Genghis' own existence, in its pure Darwinistic form, seems reducible to the existence of his forebears and nothing more. I would prefer that, in contrast to gene selection alone, pursuit of happiness forms a stable environment approaching the influence that DNA has on future generations.
 
The thing is, cultural pressures CAN make a difference in the proportion of genes found in future generations, for example see the theories about Askenazi intelligence, ot look at the meritocratic advantage in concubines implicit in the Confucian mandarinate. But seeking well-being by itself? In the European Middle Ages intelligent people found their well being in entering the celibate priesthood or religious orders, denying their genes to reproduction. A thousand years of that may be why Europe was the way it was for so long.
 
One theory goes that gay people contribute to the upbringing of the children in a community. Though they have much fewer offspring than straights, they have time and familiarity to offer. Only about 20% of schizophrenics have children, but consistently 1% of births in the general population eventually develop the disease. The statistics of inheritance are not confined to DNA, and in many cases the drive to thrive far surpasses its potential.

I guess what I am trying to express in this thread is that there are certain pervasive constructs other than genetics that influence heredity in a community, including the one which I suggest, anticipated well-being. Symbiotic organisms form an environment which imprints upon the individual as effectively as the expression of phenotypes. Take away the bonding of communal interrelationships and most sentients wither away. Mostly outside of Darwinism, the anticipation of well-being is due more to euphony between multicellulars to man and beyond. Their are traits passed down from society in general as there are from one's ancestors.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
12K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
26
Views
20K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K