Question involving beats and sound waves

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the interaction of sound waves, specifically focusing on the phenomenon of beats when two sound waves with significantly different frequencies combine. Participants are exploring the implications of this interaction on the resulting beat pattern.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions whether a beat pattern would still exist when combining two sound waves of vastly different frequencies and speculates about the frequency of the beat pattern. Other participants suggest checking the relevant formula for beat frequency and discuss the mathematical representation of the wave combination.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and prompting further exploration of the topic. Some guidance has been offered regarding the formula for beat frequency, and there is an ongoing examination of the mathematical aspects of wave addition.

Contextual Notes

There is an indication that the original poster may be confused about the relationship between the frequencies of the combining waves and the resulting beat frequency. The discussion also hints at the relevance of amplitude modulation in the context of sound waves.

insertnamehere
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Hi, I have a question involving beats and sound waves.
When two sound waves (one with a MUCH LARGER Frequency than the other) combine, what would happen? Would there still be a beat pattern? Me, I think that if there still is a beat pattern, it would have the same frequency as that of the highest frequency of one of the combining waves. Am I right, or horribly wrong? I'm really puzzled by this. Thank you very much for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
insertnamehere said:
Me, I think that if there still is a beat pattern, it would have the same frequency as that of the highest frequency of one of the combining waves. Am I right, or horribly wrong?

Check your book and find the formula for the beat frequency. It is not the higher of the two combining frequencies.
 
If wave #1 has a much larger frequency than wave #2, then what you get is (approximately) a wave of frequency #1 whose amplitude varies according to frequency #2. This is the principle used in AM (amplitude modulation) radio signals.
 
IMO, the answer can be seen clearly by looking at the "unmanipulated" equation of "beats", i.e. the simple addition of the two waves:

[tex]y(t) = Acos(\omega_1t) + Acos(\omega_2t)[/tex]

what does the addition of these two graph looks like if [itex]\omega_1 << \omega_2[/itex]?
 

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
8K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K