Trying to find the voltage of a circut

  • Thread starter Thread starter LocationX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Voltage
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the voltage in a circuit using Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL). The user initially misapplied signs and made algebraic errors in their equations, leading to incorrect voltage values. Key equations provided include V3 = -10V and a series analysis of the 10V and 12V sources against a 24V source, indicating the need for careful sign management in circuit analysis. The discussion emphasizes the importance of consistent variable definitions and directionality in loop calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL)
  • Basic circuit analysis techniques
  • Familiarity with voltage sources and their configurations
  • Ability to solve linear equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study advanced circuit analysis techniques using Thevenin's and Norton's theorems
  • Learn about circuit simulation tools like LTspice for practical applications
  • Explore the concept of nodal analysis for complex circuits
  • Review common mistakes in circuit analysis and how to avoid them
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, hobbyists working on circuit design, and professionals involved in circuit analysis and troubleshooting.

LocationX
Messages
141
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to find the voltage of a circut.

Could someone verify if I did this correct?

Questions and answers http://photobucket.com/albums/b242/physicslatex/?action=view&current=3bd3873d.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You're not keeping proper track of the signs. It makes a difference when you make a loop whether you're going through from + to - or from - to +. (You also have a couple of small algebra errors. By your equations, V3 should be a -10V, and I'm not sure about the others because your variables seem to change meaning partway through. This is a common problem, especially when you're using a lot of things that look very much alike.)

Let's look at this logically. Considering your diagram, the 10V source is shorted across v3. What does that tell you about the voltage across v3?

Now - if we removed the v2 and v3 tracks, you have the 24V source opposite to the 10 and 12v sources, which are acting in series. This means that the 10 and 12v sources are acting like an effective 22V source, opposing a 24V source. What would this tell you about the remaining voltage to be dissipated across v1?

The equations I used:

10 - v3 = 0 (loop inside the right-hand circuit, going counter-clockwise)

12 + 10 + v1 - 24 = 0 (loop around the outside, going counter-clockwise)

24 - v1 + v2 = 0 (loop inside the upper left-hand circuit, going counter-clockwise)

It's more a coincidence than anything else that I went counter-clockwise on all three. All that would change would be the signs on the numbers. Notice also that v1 changes sign between equation 2 and equation 3, reflecting the fact that I'm going a different direction through it in each case.

One other point: if you end up with a negative voltage somewhere, it simply means you chose the wrong signs for either end of the circuit element. This is clearly the case for V2 - can you see why V2 is obviously mislabelled?

Does this help?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
968
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K