Redhat vs. Mandrake (vs. Suse?)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Smurf
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the comparison of various Linux distributions, specifically Redhat, Mandrake, Gentoo, Ubuntu, and others. Participants share their experiences, preferences, and opinions on the usability and features of these operating systems, as well as their thoughts on transitioning from Windows to Linux.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant mentions a past experience with Mandrake due to difficulties finding a Redhat download.
  • Another participant shares their preference for Gentoo for workstations and Debian for servers, recommending Ubuntu/Kubuntu for new users due to good hardware detection and access to a large library.
  • Some participants express that Linux can be enjoyable to set up but may lack activities for non-programmers once operational.
  • A participant highlights the flexibility of Gentoo, noting it can be installed on top of OSX, and appreciates the vast tools available in Linux compared to Windows.
  • Another participant finds Ubuntu easy to install and manage software through tools like Synaptic and apt-get.
  • There is a mention of the evolution of Linux distributions, with one participant referring to Redhat and Mandrake as "old school" and expressing a preference for Fedora and Mandriva.
  • One participant emphasizes the robustness of Linux, citing their ability to run multiple applications and virtual screens simultaneously without issues, contrasting this with their experience on Windows.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of preferences for different Linux distributions, with no consensus on a single best option. There are competing views on the usability and appeal of various distributions, as well as differing opinions on the necessity of transitioning from Windows.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention the challenges of installation and usability for newcomers to Linux, indicating that experiences may vary based on user familiarity and specific needs.

Smurf
Messages
497
Reaction score
3
If you don't know what they are, you don't belong here. So that leaves, what? dduardo? Okay dduardo here you go:

Now. Last time I installed mandrake because the only redhat download I could find had a broken link (it was a long time ago - leave me alone). I'm using windows XP at the moment but I'm going to reformat rather soon and want to go back to linux - Which one do you use? I guess this might belong in software - move it if you like.
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
I think he's running Gentoo. I considered installing a Linux distro so it would be easier to compile and run open source, but I've found it's easy enough with Fink and X11, so I've stuck with Mac OSX. The live evals I tried out didn't seem to work too well anyway.
 
I used slack 7 way long ago. Linux is fun to **** around with and setup but once you've got it running there's not really much to do, unles youre a programmer I guess.
 
Yes, my workstation is gentoo, but my servers are debian.

I would recommend Ubuntu/Kubuntu depending on which desktop you want (Gnome/KDE). Hardware detection is good and you have access to the huge debian library.

Gentoo is great because you'll have access to the newest packages almost immediately and the whole system is extremely flexible, but the installation can be very daughting to someone who is new to linux. It isn't that hard, but you need to be patient.

In fact, gentoo is so flexible you can even install it on top of OSX:

http://gentoo-wiki.com/Gentoo_MacOS

----------

whozum, you might not find much to do, but many people, like myself find Linux to be an invaluable operating system. There are so many tools and applications that make it far superior to Windows in many repects.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have used ubuntu for quite a while and I think it is good. It is really easy to install the os, and it is easy to install software (synaptic /apt-get).
 
dduardo said:
In fact, gentoo is so flexible you can even install it on top of OSX:

http://gentoo-wiki.com/Gentoo_MacOS

Hey, thanks for that duardo. I didn't know you could do that. I considered running Mac on Linux, but this should be easier.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Redhat? Mandrake? come on man, that's old school. it's fedora and mandriva respectively :D. I've always wanted to run gentoo but it's a bit too big for my liking. Right now I run Ubuntu on windows. With the minimum requirements that windows vista will be needing, I won't be using it for a long time. Time to take open source to a next generation.
 
There is nothing Vista could offer that would make me want to switch. I'm running 4 virtual screens. Right now I have Tvtime on 1, Firefox with 5 tabs on 2, Texmacs and Maple on 3, and ngspice running various simulations and emerge recompiling glibc on 4. At the same time I've got apache and mysql serving up dynamic pages. I can switch from desktop to desktop without any hesitation. None of the apps even flinch. It is amazing how robust the linux kernel/subsubsystem is. This is on a machine with 512MB of ram and a AMD2600. Try and do that on Windows. It has enough of a hard time trying to keep the tv stable.

I don't need no stink'n 3d windows. What's the purpose? To force me to buy more expensive hardware?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
9K
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 123 ·
5
Replies
123
Views
21K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K