| Thread Closed |
Mathematics Journal, Proof for |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Sep26-05, 11:25 PM | #1 |
|
|
Mathematics Journal, Proof for
Hello.
I was reading a journal and an interesting problem came up. I believe the journal was in the American Mathematics Society publications. Well, here's the statement. "For all integers, n greater than or equal to 3, the number of compositions of n into relatively prime parts is a multiple of 3." Example : For 4: the compositions of relatively prime parts are: (1,3), (3,1), (2,1,1), (1,2,1), (1,1,2), (1,1,1,1). This is what I have so far for a "proof": Let n be an integer greater than or equal to 3. Then the first composition will be given by (n-1, 1), (1, n-1); since for all k, an integer, (k, 1) and (1, k) are always relatively prime. Also, (1, 1, ..., 1) where the composition adds to n is also an obtainable composition. (So basically, I've gotten the end points of the compositions to be a multiple of 3, then I need to prove that the "in-between" compositions will also be a multiple of 3.) Well, obviously I'm stuck there. I've tried to split it into two cases afterwards where the cases involve n - odd and n - even but it has come to no avail. Also I've tried to find a formula where the compositions of relatively prime parts is a multiple of 3 but it fails at "6". Here was the formula I came up with that failed, if it could be potentially be improved upon. Formula: Starting at n=1, where i=3, i being the starting point. (i)!/2^n Like: For 3, 3! = 6 divided by 2^1 = 2 will equal 3 compositions- a multiple of 3 For 4, 4! = 24 divided by 2^2 = 4 will equal 6 compositions - a multiple of 3 For 5, 5! = 120 divided by 2^3 = 8 will equal 15 compositions - multiple of 3 Well, hopefully people will post their ideas... |
| Sep29-05, 02:42 AM | #2 |
|
|
Any algebraist in here that could help?
|
| Oct8-05, 04:22 AM | #3 |
|
|
Well, I've still been trying to prove this for the past week. I think there may be some recursion sequence or something. Well, I've tried listing the compositions and here's the results:
n=3 : 3 compositions n=4 : 6 compositions n=5 : 15 compositions n=6 : 27 compositions n=7 : 63 compositions n=8 : 129 compositions I'm predicting that n=9 : 387 compositions n=10 : 687 compositions Anyone feel like lending a hand...? |
| Oct8-05, 05:07 AM | #4 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Mathematics Journal, Proof for
Maybe I don't really get what you mean... But for n = 5, I get 10 compositions, which means it fails for n = 5.
n = 5: (1, 4), (4, 1) (1, 1, 3), (1, 3, 1), (3, 1, 1) (1, 1, 1, 2), (1, 1, 2, 1), (1, 2, 1, 1), (2, 1, 1, 1) (1, 1, 1, 1, 1) That's 2 + 3 + 4 + 1 = 10... ![]() Viet Dao, |
| Oct9-05, 04:47 AM | #5 |
|
|
(3,2), (2,3), (2,2,1), (2,1,2), (1,2,2), which adds to 15.
|
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Mathematics Journal, Proof for
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Discrete Mathematics Absolute Value Proof | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 3 | ||
| Mathematics by proof | General Math | 4 | ||
| journal access | Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics | 2 | ||
| My Journal of Basic Concepts of Mathematics | Calculus | 30 | ||
| A Mathematics Proof Book | Calculus | 13 | ||